IOA President PT Usha Faces No-Confidence Motion from Executive Committee

IOA President PT Usha Faces No-Confidence Motion from Executive Committee

The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) is embroiled in a power struggle, with 12 of its 15 executive committee members planning to move a motion of no confidence against president PT Usha at a Special General Meeting (SGM) on October 25.

The rift between Usha and the EC members has escalated, leading to a 26-point agenda for the SGM. The agenda includes discussions on Usha’s functioning, conduct, non-compliance with the IOA constitution, and failure to convene an Annual General Meeting.

The EC members also allege that Usha has “pressurized the finance committee to approve unauthorized expenses related to her.” The agenda’s final point is a “vote of no confidence against the president.”

The agenda also includes a detailed discussion on sponsorship agreements executed by Usha without consulting the sponsorship committee or the executive council. Usha has faced scrutiny after a Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report observed a loss of ₹24 crore to IOA due to Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) being given four extra events without any extra price.

Usha has defended her actions, claiming that the EC members were aware of the negotiations with RIL and that it was done to protect the rights fee payable by the company. However, the EC members have objected to Usha’s unilateral decisions and have accused her of violating the constitution.

The dispute has also centered around the appointment of Raghuram Iyer as CEO. The EC members have objected to his pay package and have brought back joint secretary Kalyan Chaubey as acting CEO. Usha has called an SGM to discuss the dispute and put it to a vote.

The agenda also includes matters related to corruption and complaints against some EC members regarding their ineligibility to hold office. The EC members have accused Usha of non-compliance with constitutional mandates and unilateral decision-making.

The showdown between Usha and the EC members has reached a critical point, with the motion of no confidence potentially leading to her removal as president.

IOA President PT Usha Defends Sponsorship Renegotiation, Accuses EC Members of Obstruction

IOA President PT Usha Defends Sponsorship Renegotiation, Accuses EC Members of Obstruction

Indian Olympic Association (IOA) President PT Usha has defended her decision to renegotiate the sponsorship agreement with Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), stating that executive committee members were aware and involved in the discussions.

Usha’s actions came under scrutiny after a Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report alleged a loss of ₹24 crore to IOA due to RIL being granted four additional events without extra payment. However, Usha claims that the renegotiation was necessary to protect the rights fee of ₹35 crore payable by RIL.

According to Usha, RIL sought to reduce the rights fee by 50% after the International Olympic Committee (IOC) clarified that sponsor branding at the India House during the Paris Olympics would be limited to the inside of the NOC House. This would have deprived RIL of significant brand mileage.

Usha convened a meeting with RIL representatives and Rohit Rajpal, Chairman of IOA’s sponsorship committee, on September 20, 2023, to discuss the options. These included terminating the sponsorship agreement, accepting the 50% reduction in rights fee, or negotiating with RIL to ensure the establishment of the NOC House at Paris and protect future cash flow.

Usha maintains that all EC members, including Kalyan Chaubey, were informed of the discussions and were part of the decision-making process. She also highlights that Rajpal had spoken to RIL directly.

Usha’s comments come amid ongoing tensions with EC members over the appointment of Raghu Iyer as CEO. The EC has objected to Iyer’s pay package and has not ratified his appointment. Usha has called an SGM later this month to address the matter.

Usha expressed frustration with the EC’s behavior, accusing them of creating problems and attempting to “usurp power.” She cited examples of EC members seeking inappropriate positions and privileges, such as becoming Ski and Snowboard Chairman despite having no experience in winter sports.

Despite the challenges, Usha remains optimistic that the impasse will be resolved and that preparations for the Paris Olympics and India’s bid for the 2036 Olympics will not be affected.

Home
Shop
Wishlist0
Back to Top

Search For Products

Product has been added to your cart