Kohli's Muted Reaction Raises Questions in India vs New Zealand Test

Kohli’s Muted Reaction Raises Questions in India vs New Zealand Test

Virat Kohli, the fiery Indian batter, displayed an uncharacteristic restraint during the first Test against New Zealand. Known for his passionate and aggressive on-field demeanor, Kohli’s muted reaction to a controversial dismissal raised eyebrows.

In the 89th over of New Zealand’s innings, Rachin Ravindra was given out caught behind off Mohammed Siraj’s bowling. The entire Indian team erupted in celebration, including umpire Michael Gough. However, replays revealed that the ball had not touched Ravindra’s bat, but rather a separate noise had occurred.

Commentators Harsha Bhogle and Ian Smith noticed that Kohli, positioned at first slip, remained unmoved throughout the proceedings. Replays confirmed that Kohli had indeed not celebrated, despite the initial jubilation from his teammates.

Bhogle remarked that Kohli, known for his expressive nature, was at the top of the list of “most expressive people in the world.” He suggested that Kohli’s muted reaction may have hinted at his belief that the dismissal was not legitimate.

Kohli’s restraint stood in stark contrast to his usual on-field persona. As India’s former captain, he had earned a reputation for wearing his heart on his sleeve and approaching every game with an aggressive, but fair, demeanor.

The incident highlights the complexities of the game of cricket and the importance of fair play. While the Indian team initially celebrated the dismissal, Kohli’s muted reaction served as a reminder that the spirit of the game should always prevail.

Despite India’s strong batting performance on Day 3, they suffered a setback when Kohli was dismissed caught behind on the final ball of the day. India ended the day on 231/3, still trailing New Zealand by a significant margin of 125 runs.

Argentina's Martinez Banned for Two Matches for Offensive Behavior

Argentina’s Martinez Banned for Two Matches for Offensive Behavior

Emiliano Martinez, Argentina’s World Cup-winning goalkeeper, has been suspended for two matches by FIFA for “offensive behavior” and “violating principles of fairplay.” The Argentine Football Association (AFA) announced the ban on Saturday.

Martinez, 32, was found to have violated FIFA’s code of conduct when he held a replica of the Copa America trophy to his groin after Argentina’s World Cup qualifier win over Chile on September 5. He had previously performed a similar action with the Golden Glove trophy for best goalkeeper after Argentina’s victory over France in the 2022 World Cup final.

FIFA also sanctioned Martinez for hitting a TV cameraman’s camera with his gloves after Argentina’s 2-1 defeat by Colombia on September 10.

The AFA expressed its dissatisfaction with the FIFA ruling, stating in a statement that it “expresses its absolute disagreement with the decision taken by the FIFA disciplinary committee.”

As a result of the suspension, Martinez will miss Argentina’s World Cup qualifiers against Venezuela on October 10 and Bolivia on October 15. Argentina currently leads the South American qualifying table with 18 points after eight matches, with Colombia trailing by just two points.

Martinez’s suspension highlights the ongoing debate over the appropriate boundaries of celebration in sports. While some argue that his actions were harmless and in the spirit of the game, others believe that they were disrespectful and unsportsmanlike.

The incident also raises questions about the role of FIFA in regulating player behavior. Some critics argue that the organization is too quick to punish players for minor offenses, while others believe that it is necessary to maintain a level of decorum in the sport.

Age Fraud in Youth Football: Jhingan Calls for Eradication

Age Fraud in Youth Football: Jhingan Calls for Eradication

Age Fraud in Youth Football: A Damaging Practice

Age fraud, the practice of fielding overage players in youth competitions, has been a persistent issue in football, damaging the confidence and development of young players. FC Goa defender Sandesh Jhingan, a victim of this practice, has spoken out against its detrimental effects.

Jhingan recalled his experiences playing against older opponents during his youth, highlighting the significant physical and mental advantages they possessed. “I have many times felt that I was not good enough, because that boy was stronger, faster, and more mature than me,” he said. “At that age, even a difference of two years makes a massive difference.”

The negative impact of age fraud extends beyond individual players. It creates an unfair playing field, discouraging talented youth from pursuing the sport. Jhingan emphasized the need to eradicate this practice, stating, “It needs to stop big time. I am really happy that all the clubs and the Reliance Foundation are coming together to solve this problem.”

The Stay Your Age U-15 football tournament, held in Navi Mumbai, aimed to address the issue of age fraud. Players from six teams underwent rigorous document verification to ensure fair competition. The tournament provided a platform for young players to showcase their skills without the burden of competing against overage opponents.

Jhingan’s advocacy against age fraud highlights the importance of protecting the integrity of youth football. By ensuring that players compete in their appropriate age groups, we can foster a fair and equitable environment that nurtures the development of young talent.

No-Balls in Cricket: A Guide to Illegal Deliveries and Consequences

No-Balls in Cricket: A Guide to Illegal Deliveries and Consequences

No-Balls in Cricket: A Comprehensive Guide

In cricket, a no-ball is an illegal delivery by the bowler, resulting in a free hit for the batsman in limited-overs matches. This rule is enforced by umpires to ensure fair play and safety.

Common Reasons for No-Balls

* Overstepping the Popping Crease: The bowler’s front foot must remain behind the popping crease at the moment of delivery.
* Bowling Above Waist Height: The ball must be delivered below the batsman’s waist height in their normal stance.
* Overextended Bowling Arm: The bowler’s bowling arm must not be extended beyond 15 degrees at the elbow.
* Illegal Bowling Actions: Certain bowling actions, such as chucking or throwing, are deemed illegal and result in a no-ball.
* Dangerous Deliveries: Deliveries that pose a safety risk to the batsman, such as bouncers that are too high or wide, can also be called as no-balls.

Consequences of a No-Ball

* The batting side is awarded one run.
* The next ball is a free hit, during which the batsman cannot be dismissed by any means except run out or stumping.

Rare No-Ball Decision in Vitality T20 Blast

During a 2024 Vitality T20 Blast match between Somerset and Northamptonshire, a rare no-ball decision was made. Upon reviewing a stumping appeal, the third umpire determined that the wicketkeeper’s gloves were ahead of the stumps at the time of delivery, rendering the delivery illegal. This no-ball gave the batsman a free hit, which he capitalized on by hitting a six.

Somerset’s Victory

Somerset, led by Lewis Gregory, posted a formidable 215/3 in their 20 overs, thanks to half-centuries from Tom Banton and Tom Kohler-Cadmore. In response, Northamptonshire managed 198/5, giving Somerset a 17-run victory. Somerset will now face Surrey in the semifinals on September 14 in Birmingham.

Three Teams Disqualified from Subroto Cup for Fielding Overage Players

Three Teams Disqualified from Subroto Cup for Fielding Overage Players

Subroto Cup: Three Teams Disqualified for Fielding Overage Players

The 63rd Subroto Cup sub-junior boys international football tournament has witnessed the disqualification of three teams for fielding overage players. Nazareth Model High School (Assam), Nehru Public School (Bihar), and Ultou Government Model High School (Manipur) have been removed from the competition.

The disqualification was announced by the Subroto Mukerjee Sports Education Society, which operates under the Air Force Sports Control Board. An official release stated that the teams were found to have fielded more than four players above the age limit.

A Skeletal Age Estimation Test was conducted in accordance with tournament regulations and All India Football Federation (AIFF) criteria. The results of matches played by the disqualified teams on Day 1 have been declared null and void.

Reports on three other teams from Mizoram, Madhya Pradesh, and Maharashtra are pending and will be received on Tuesday. A decision on their status will be made based on those results.

In the previous edition of the Subroto Cup, 16 teams were disqualified for fielding overage players. This issue has been a persistent problem in youth football tournaments, raising concerns about the integrity of the competition and the well-being of young athletes.

The Subroto Cup is one of the most prestigious youth football tournaments in India, attracting teams from across the country and abroad. The tournament aims to promote football at the grassroots level and provide a platform for young players to showcase their skills.

The disqualification of teams for fielding overage players highlights the importance of age verification and adherence to tournament regulations. It also serves as a reminder that the integrity of youth sports must be maintained to ensure fair play and the development of young athletes.

Sunrisers Hyderabad CEO Proposes Major IPL Retention and Auction Reforms

Sunrisers Hyderabad CEO Proposes Major IPL Retention and Auction Reforms

IPL Reforms: Sunrisers Hyderabad CEO Proposes Overhaul of Retention and Auction Processes

In a bid to enhance strategic flexibility, ensure fair market pricing, and maintain the integrity of the Indian Premier League (IPL), Kavya Kalanithi Maran, CEO of Sunrisers Hyderabad, has presented a comprehensive set of proposals to reform the retention and auction processes.

Maran’s primary suggestion is to allow franchises a minimum of six retentions or Right to Match (RTM) options ahead of the mega auction. This flexibility would enable teams to retain a core group of players while also allowing them to acquire new talent through the auction.

To address concerns about player satisfaction with retention amounts, Maran proposes that players be given the option to either be retained or go to auction at a market-discovered price. This would prevent disputes over retention amounts and ensure that players are fairly compensated.

Maran also advocates for removing the cap on retaining foreign players. She argues that each team has unique strengths and weaknesses, and the number of foreign players retained should be at the discretion of the franchise.

To prevent players from reneging on their commitments, Maran proposes banning players who do not show up after being purchased at the auction, unless due to injury. This would ensure that teams can rely on the players they acquire.

Regarding retired players, Maran believes they should be treated fairly in the auction. She suggests that their experience and brand value should be reflected in their auction price, rather than being classified as uncapped.

Finally, Maran proposes changes to how money is deducted from the overall salary cap for retained players. She suggests that the money deducted should be an overall pot based on the number of players retained, with franchises having the discretion to decide how to split the amount among retained players.

Maran’s proposals aim to create a more balanced and competitive IPL, where franchises have greater flexibility in building their squads and players are fairly compensated.

Ashwin Warned for Backing Up Too Far, Clarifies Rule

Ashwin Warned for Backing Up Too Far, Clarifies Rule

Ravichandran Ashwin, a staunch advocate of running out non-strikers, recently found himself on the receiving end of a warning for backing up too far. The incident occurred during a Tamil Nadu Premier League (TNPL) match between his team, Dindigul Dragons, and Nellai Royal Kings.

In the 15th over, left-arm spinner Mohan Prasath halted his run-up after noticing Ashwin out of his crease. Replays revealed that while Ashwin was prematurely walking down the crease, his bat slipped out of the popping crease when Prasath stopped.

This incident sparked debates on social media. Some criticized Ashwin for experiencing the consequences of his own actions, while others argued that the warning was unwarranted as he gained no unfair advantage.

Ashwin himself took to Twitter to clarify the situation, posting a screenshot of the relevant law (38.3) which states that a non-striker is only liable to be run out when the ball is in play and the bowler is expected to release it. In this case, Ashwin would not have been out even if Prasath had dislodged the bails.

“Cos they don’t know the rule,” Ashwin tweeted in response to criticism that commentators failed to highlight this fact.

Meanwhile, Ashwin is currently not part of the Indian team for the ongoing white-ball tour of Sri Lanka. He is expected to return for the upcoming home Test series against Bangladesh.

In other news, India secured an unassailable 2-0 lead in the three-match T20I series against Sri Lanka with a seven-wicket victory in the rain-affected second match. The third and final T20I will be played on Tuesday in Pallekele, followed by a three-match ODI series.

Ashwin's Humorous Mankading Warning in TNPL 2024

Ashwin’s Humorous Mankading Warning in TNPL 2024

Ravichandran Ashwin’s Humorous Mankading Warning in TNPL 2024

Ravichandran Ashwin, the renowned Indian off-spinner, found himself in a comical situation during a Tamil Nadu Premier League (TNPL) 2024 match between the Nellai Royal Kings and the Dindigul Dragons. In a moment that left spectators and commentators in stitches, Ashwin received a warning for leaving the non-striker’s end too early, despite keeping his bat grounded until the last possible moment.

The incident occurred during the 15th over of the Dindigul Dragons’ innings. Bowler Mohan Prasath, in a light-hearted gesture, issued the warning to Ashwin, who had been known to be a vocal advocate for the legality of “mankading,” a method of dismissal where the bowler runs out the non-striker for backing up too far.

The incident sparked laughter among the commentators, who couldn’t resist poking fun at Ashwin’s strict adherence to the rules. Star Sports shared a video of the moment on social media, with a caption that translated to, “Ash Anna be like: Headmaster of the school you studied in!”

Ashwin’s stance on mankading has been a topic of debate since he dismissed Jos Buttler in this manner during the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2019. While some argue that it is a fair and legal dismissal, others believe it goes against the spirit of the game.

Despite the controversy, Ashwin remains a staunch supporter of mankading, arguing that it is within the rules of cricket and helps to prevent non-strikers from taking unfair advantage. His actions and statements continue to highlight the importance of adhering to the laws of the game and the ongoing debate surrounding the ethics of mankading.

Kohli and Gambhir's Embrace at IPL 2024 Draws Fairplay Applause

Kohli and Gambhir’s Embrace at IPL 2024 Draws Fairplay Applause

Virat Kohli and Gautam Gambhir’s Heartwarming Embrace at IPL 2024 Sparks Fairplay Applause

In a heartwarming display of sportsmanship, former rivals Virat Kohli and Gautam Gambhir shared a warm embrace during the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) vs Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) match at the M Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru on Friday. The moment, captured by the official broadcasters, drew widespread praise from cricket legends Sunil Gavaskar and Ravi Shastri.

Gavaskar, commentating alongside Shastri, remarked that the embrace deserved a fairplay award, while Shastri quipped that it warranted an Oscar. The gesture marked a significant departure from the heated exchanges between the duo on the field in the past.

During the IPL 2023 season, Gambhir, then serving as mentor for the Lucknow Super Giants (LSG), engaged in a verbal altercation with Kohli following a heated exchange between Kohli and LSG pacer Naveen Ul Haq. However, at IPL 2024, the hatchet seemed to have been buried as Kohli and Gambhir shook hands and shared a smile during the strategic timeout.

The embrace between the two former India captains was widely shared on social media, with fans and experts alike applauding their display of sportsmanship. It served as a reminder that even in the heat of competition, fairplay and respect should prevail.

The moment also highlighted the transformative power of time and the ability of individuals to move beyond past differences. Kohli and Gambhir’s embrace symbolized the spirit of reconciliation and the importance of putting aside grudges for the greater good of the game.

Halep's Miami Wild Card Sparks Debate on Doping and Fair Play

Halep’s Miami Wild Card Sparks Debate on Doping and Fair Play

Simona Halep’s Miami Wild Card Sparks Debate on Doping and Fair Play

Simona Halep’s successful appeal for a wild card entry into the Miami Open has reignited the debate on the role of doping in professional tennis. Former world No. 1 Kim Clijsters and Andy Roddick discussed the issue on their podcast, “Served with Andy Roddick.”

Clijsters expressed support for Halep, who tested positive for a banned substance in 2022 but claimed it was an unintentional ingestion. “Halep’s situation is completely different,” Clijsters said. “She tested positive unknowingly.”

However, former world No. 1 Caroline Wozniacki voiced her disapproval of the tournament’s decision to grant Halep a wild card. “She was very cautious when she said it, but basically she doesn’t believe people who have doped should be back and be given wild cards,” Roddick said.

Roddick disagreed with Wozniacki, arguing that Halep’s presence in the tournament was good for business. “It’s a business, and you want [Halep] as a storyline,” he said.

Clijsters acknowledged the complexity of the issue. “When someone tests positive for taking something to become a better athlete, then I one hundred percent agree with Caroline,” she said. “But Halep’s situation is different.”

The debate also touched on Halep’s previous comments about Maria Sharapova, who received a wild card after serving a doping suspension in 2017. Halep had said at the time that she believed dopers should not be allowed wild cards.

“Her saying something about Maria in the past shows her vision of how she looks at doping and that she’s not a cheater,” Clijsters said. “In [Halep’s] mind, she didn’t cheat, and I do believe that.”

The podcast also discussed the broader issue of doping in tennis and the sport’s meticulous drug testing protocols. They also touched on the recent $2 billion Saudi Arabia deal on the table for the ATP Tour and the potential implications for the sport.

Home
Shop
Wishlist0
Back to Top

Search For Products

Product has been added to your cart