Over 100 Female Footballers Slam FIFA's Saudi Aramco Sponsorship

Over 100 Female Footballers Slam FIFA’s Saudi Aramco Sponsorship

FIFA’s Saudi Aramco Sponsorship Draws Ire of Over 100 Female Footballers

Over 100 professional female footballers from 24 countries have vehemently condemned FIFA’s sponsorship deal with Saudi Aramco, the world’s largest state-owned oil and gas company. The partnership, signed in April 2023, will run until 2027 and encompass major events like the FIFA World Cup 2026 and FIFA Women’s World Cup 2027.

In a strongly worded letter, the players expressed their dismay and disappointment over FIFA’s decision. They highlighted Saudi Arabia’s abysmal human rights record, particularly regarding gender equality and freedom of expression. The letter emphasized that Saudi Aramco, as the primary financial lifeline of the Saudi regime, is complicit in these violations.

The players urged FIFA to reconsider the partnership and seek alternative sponsors whose values align with gender equality, human rights, and environmental sustainability. They also proposed the establishment of a review committee with player representation to evaluate the ethical implications of future sponsorship deals.

The letter pointed out that FIFA’s Council, which made the decision to partner with Saudi Aramco, is predominantly male (8 out of 37 members are women). The players argued that these decisions are made by individuals who are not directly affected by the Saudi regime’s oppressive policies.

The players also raised concerns about Saudi Arabia’s alleged use of sports sponsorship to whitewash its human rights abuses. They cited the examples of Russia 2018 and Qatar 2022, where FIFA’s partnerships with authoritarian regimes raised ethical questions.

Becky Sauerbrunn, former captain of the US National Women’s Team, stated, “The safety of women, the rights of women, LGBTQ rights, and the health of the planet need to take a much bigger priority over FIFA making more money.”

Sofie Junge Pedersen, a Danish international and one of the architects of the letter, emphasized, “Values are not just words to write on a page – you need to live them and stand by them. FIFA needs to stand by its set of values on human rights and sustainability, which they are not doing with this sponsorship.”

The players’ letter has garnered widespread support from human rights organizations and activists. It remains to be seen whether FIFA will respond to the players’ demands and reconsider its partnership with Saudi Aramco.

Anwar Ali's Kolkata Derby Debut Amidst Legal Storm

Anwar Ali’s Kolkata Derby Debut Amidst Legal Storm

Anwar Ali, the central defender for East Bengal, faces a daunting task in his first Kolkata derby for his new club. The match against Mohun Bagan Super Giant on Saturday is not just a sporting event but a complex legal and personal battleground for Ali.

Ali’s transfer from Mohun Bagan to East Bengal in the summer was marred by a FIFA ruling and court cases. The All India Football Federation (AIFF) initially approved Ali’s loan deal to Mohun Bagan until 2027, but FIFA’s regulations prohibit long-term loans beyond 2025. Ali cited this ruling to terminate his contract with Mohun Bagan, leading to a legal battle.

The AIFF’s Players’ Status Committee ruled in Ali’s favor, allowing him to terminate his contract but without just cause. As a result, Ali was banned for four months and ordered to pay Mohun Bagan ₹12.9 crore in compensation. However, the Delhi High Court intervened and allowed Ali to play while the AIFF committee reviewed the case.

Despite the ongoing legal uncertainty, Ali has been a key player for East Bengal and the Indian national team. His performances have drawn praise from former India coach Igor Stimac, who called him “one of the best centre-backs in Asia.”

Ali’s presence in the Kolkata derby will be closely scrutinized by both East Bengal and Mohun Bagan fans. East Bengal hopes he will provide stability to their defense, while Mohun Bagan fans will be eager to see him fail.

However, Ali’s focus remains on the game itself. “We don’t talk about such things in the changing room,” said East Bengal midfielder Saul Crespo. “That is the club’s job.”

For Ali, the Kolkata derby is not just a match but a symbol of his resilience and determination. Having overcome adversity in the past, he is ready to face the challenges that lie ahead.

FIFA Suspends Italian Footballer for Discriminatory Remark

FIFA Suspends Italian Footballer for Discriminatory Remark

FIFA has imposed a 10-match suspension on Italian footballer Marco Curto for making a discriminatory remark towards South Korean forward Hee Chan Hwang during a preseason friendly between Como and Wolverhampton. The incident occurred in July, with Hwang reporting the remark to the referee during the second half.

Como initially defended Curto, claiming his comment that Hwang “thinks he’s Jackie Chan” was not intended to be derogatory. However, the South Korea Football Association filed a formal complaint with FIFA, which subsequently notified Curto of his disciplinary ban on October 7, 2024.

FIFA’s statement confirmed that Curto was found responsible for discriminatory behavior and sanctioned with a 10-match suspension. The 25-year-old has since been loaned by Como to Serie B club Cesena and is set to miss five league games through November 10.

FIFA has also deferred five games of the ban for a probationary period of two years. This means that Curto could face an additional five-match suspension if he commits any further discriminatory offenses during that time.

The incident has highlighted FIFA’s commitment to combating racism and discrimination in football. Earlier this year, the governing body urged all 211 of its member federations to take a coordinated approach to prosecuting incidents of alleged racism and discrimination.

Curto’s suspension serves as a reminder that discriminatory behavior will not be tolerated in the sport. It also sends a strong message that FIFA is determined to create a more inclusive and respectful environment for all players and fans.

FIFA Club World Cup Final to be Held at MetLife Stadium in 2023

FIFA Club World Cup Final to be Held at MetLife Stadium in 2023

The FIFA Club World Cup, an expanded tournament featuring 32 of the world’s top club teams, will culminate in a grand finale at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey on July 13, 2023. The stadium, home to the NFL’s New York Giants and New York Jets, will also host the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

The inaugural edition of the expanded Club World Cup will kick off on June 15, with matches taking place at 12 venues across the United States. The tournament will run concurrently with the CONCACAF Gold Cup, which will be primarily held on the West Coast.

The other venues selected for the Club World Cup include Mercedes-Benz Stadium (Atlanta), Bank of America Stadium (Charlotte), TQL Stadium (Cincinnati), Hard Rock Stadium (Miami), GEODIS Park (Nashville), Camping World Stadium (Orlando), Inter&Co Stadium (Orlando), Lincoln Financial Field (Philadelphia), and Audi Field (Washington, D.C.).

The draw for the tournament will be held in December, with 30 of the 32 participating teams already determined through qualification. The Club World Cup will feature title-winning teams from each of FIFA’s continental confederations, including Real Madrid, Manchester City, and Bayern Munich from Europe, and River Plate, Boca Juniors, and Flamengo from South America.

FIFA President Gianni Infantino hailed the tournament as a testament to inclusivity and solidarity in global club football. He emphasized its potential to foster the growth of the sport and nurture talent worldwide.

The Club World Cup will serve as a crucial test event ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, with a focus on security measures following crowd issues at recent Copa America matches in Charlotte and Miami.

Despite facing some opposition from player unions and European leagues, FIFA remains committed to the expanded tournament, which it plans to hold every four years. The 2029 edition is yet to have a designated host.

Argentina's Martinez Banned for Two Matches for Offensive Behavior

Argentina’s Martinez Banned for Two Matches for Offensive Behavior

Emiliano Martinez, Argentina’s World Cup-winning goalkeeper, has been suspended for two matches by FIFA for “offensive behavior” and “violating principles of fairplay.” The Argentine Football Association (AFA) announced the ban on Saturday.

Martinez, 32, was found to have violated FIFA’s code of conduct when he held a replica of the Copa America trophy to his groin after Argentina’s World Cup qualifier win over Chile on September 5. He had previously performed a similar action with the Golden Glove trophy for best goalkeeper after Argentina’s victory over France in the 2022 World Cup final.

FIFA also sanctioned Martinez for hitting a TV cameraman’s camera with his gloves after Argentina’s 2-1 defeat by Colombia on September 10.

The AFA expressed its dissatisfaction with the FIFA ruling, stating in a statement that it “expresses its absolute disagreement with the decision taken by the FIFA disciplinary committee.”

As a result of the suspension, Martinez will miss Argentina’s World Cup qualifiers against Venezuela on October 10 and Bolivia on October 15. Argentina currently leads the South American qualifying table with 18 points after eight matches, with Colombia trailing by just two points.

Martinez’s suspension highlights the ongoing debate over the appropriate boundaries of celebration in sports. While some argue that his actions were harmless and in the spirit of the game, others believe that they were disrespectful and unsportsmanlike.

The incident also raises questions about the role of FIFA in regulating player behavior. Some critics argue that the organization is too quick to punish players for minor offenses, while others believe that it is necessary to maintain a level of decorum in the sport.

Igor Stimac Receives USD 400,000 Compensation from AIFF

Igor Stimac Receives USD 400,000 Compensation from AIFF

Igor Stimac, the former head coach of the Indian men’s national football team, has reached an agreement with the All India Football Federation (AIFF) to receive USD 400,000 (approximately ₹3.36 crore) after tax as compensation for his termination.

Stimac was sacked by the AIFF in June, a year before his contract was set to expire, following India’s elimination from the second round of FIFA World Cup Qualifiers. The sacking sparked a public dispute between Stimac and the AIFF, with the Croat threatening legal action if his dues were not settled within 10 days.

However, the two parties have now reached an amicable resolution. “The AIFF top brass has approved payment of USD 400,000 as compensation to settle the issue with AIFF,” a source close to the development told PTI.

The compensation amount is significant for the AIFF, which has faced financial challenges in recent times and has reduced its competitions budget this year. The federation had initially offered Stimac three months’ salary as compensation, but he rejected the offer and filed a claim with FIFA for USD 920,000 (approximately ₹7.72 crore) as two years’ salary.

Stimac, who was appointed as head coach in 2019, was given an extension until 2026 by the AIFF in October 2021. However, the extension was conditional on the team reaching the quarterfinals of the Asian Cup, a feat that India has never achieved. India finished last in their group in the 2011 and 2015 editions of the continental tournament.

Manolo Marquez has replaced Stimac as the new head coach of the Indian men’s team. Stimac had previously rejected offers from the AIFF to settle for five and then 10 months’ salary.

Record-Breaking Summer Transfer Window Sees Over 11,000 International Transfers

Record-Breaking Summer Transfer Window Sees Over 11,000 International Transfers

FIFA’s recent report reveals a record-breaking summer transfer window, with over 11,000 international transfers registered globally. Despite a slight decline in spending compared to last year, clubs across the globe invested heavily to bolster their squads.

The most expensive transfer of the window was Julian Alvarez’s move from Manchester City to Atletico Madrid for a staggering €75 million. Kylian Mbappe’s sensational free transfer to Real Madrid also made headlines, with the French forward reportedly receiving a hefty signing bonus.

However, overall spending on transfer fees cooled off during the mid-year trading period. FIFA’s research indicates that clubs committed to spend $6.46 billion on international player deals, down from $7.43 billion in the same period last year.

The average transfer fee paid by European clubs, the richest market, was $3.13 million, a decrease from $3.8 million a year ago. Notably, the FIFA study excludes the biggest transfer deal of the European offseason, Dominic Solanke’s move from Bournemouth to Tottenham.

English clubs emerged as the biggest net spenders, investing $1.69 billion on international transfers. Italy and Saudi Arabia also had significant net spending, while Belgian clubs made a net profit of $302 million.

Clubs from Argentina and Brazil also benefited from the transfer window, receiving more than they spent on international deals.

Of the record 11,000 international transfers processed by FIFA, nearly 6,300 were free agent players. This highlights the growing trend of clubs acquiring players without paying transfer fees.

Igor Stimac Files FIFA Complaint Against AIFF for Breach of Contract

Igor Stimac Files FIFA Complaint Against AIFF for Breach of Contract

Igor Stimac, the former head coach of the Indian national football team, has filed a complaint with FIFA seeking compensation from the All India Football Federation (AIFF) for breach of contract. Stimac’s contract was terminated in June 2023, and he claims that he is entitled to compensation until June 2026, as per the terms of his contract.

Stimac’s lawyer, Davor Radic, stated that the termination of his client’s contract was without just cause and that the compensation offered by the AIFF was unacceptable. The case is likely to be referred to FIFA’s Players’ Status Chamber, which handles employment-related disputes between associations and coaches of international dimension.

Stimac was appointed as India’s head coach in May 2019 and was responsible for some notable achievements, including a 0-0 draw against Asian champions Qatar and three tournament wins at home in 2023. However, India’s poor performance in the Asian Cup and World Cup qualifiers led to his dismissal.

Under Stimac’s contract, he was entitled to a monthly salary of $30,000 until January 2025 and $40,000 thereafter until June 2026. If AIFF is ordered to pay, the total amount could exceed ₹7.5 crore.

The AIFF has not yet received any official communication from FIFA or Stimac regarding the complaint. However, acting secretary-general Satyanarayan Muthyalu stated that the federation will present its version of events to FIFA.

Stimac’s Croatian assistants, Luka Radman and Frano Srdarev, who had contracts until 2025, are reportedly willing to accept six months’ salary from AIFF as compensation.

Canada's Olympic Women's Football Team Triumphs Amidst Adversity

Canada’s Olympic Women’s Football Team Triumphs Amidst Adversity

Canada’s Olympic women’s football team has overcome adversity to keep their gold medal hopes alive after a 1-0 victory against Colombia. Despite a six-point penalty imposed by FIFA for spying on opponents, the team has rallied together and secured a crucial win.

The penalty, which stemmed from allegations of using a drone to spy on New Zealand’s training session, had left Canada with zero points after wins against New Zealand and France. However, defender Vanessa Giles’ goal in the 62nd minute, assisted by skipper Jessie Fleming, proved to be the game-winner against Colombia.

The team’s resilience has been a testament to their strong bond, which has helped them navigate the challenges they have faced. “We haven’t eaten, we’ve been crying,” Giles said after the win against France. “But we’ve held each other through this and we have nothing to lose.”

The spying scandal has cast a shadow over Canada’s Olympic campaign, with former goalkeeper Stephanie Labbe accusing the team of being let down by their own people. Coach Bev Priestman and two assistants were banned for a year by FIFA, and interim head coach Andy Spence was put in charge.

Despite the setbacks, Canada Soccer appealed the penalty to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), arguing that it was disproportionate and penalized players who had no involvement in the incident. However, CAS rejected the appeal eight hours before the Colombia match.

“Going into the match we wanted to win regardless of what that ruling was,” said Fleming. “It did not change our game plan or what we wanted to do.”

Canada’s victory against Colombia has put them in second place in their group behind France. The top two teams from each of the three groups and the two best third-placed teams will qualify for the quarter-finals. Canada’s next challenge will be against Germany, the 2016 gold medallists.

FIFA Seeks Update on AIFF Constitution Amid Legal Delay

FIFA Seeks Update on AIFF Constitution Amid Legal Delay

The All India Football Federation (AIFF) is facing scrutiny from FIFA over the delay in adopting its new constitution. In a letter dated June 22, FIFA and the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) expressed concern that they had not received an update from AIFF since July 31, 2023, and requested a response by July 5.

AIFF responded, stating that the matter is currently sub-judice, meaning it is being considered by the Supreme Court of India. However, FIFA-AFC emphasized that the AIFF Congress, as the supreme legislative body of the federation, should have the authority to amend statutes without judicial intervention.

The FIFA-AFC letter refers to a meeting held on May 16, 2023, where AIFF was asked to provide an update on the new constitution. This followed a Supreme Court order appointing former Justice Nageswara Rao to oversee the drafting process. Rao submitted the draft statutes to the court on July 31, 2023, but the matter has since been delayed due to objections from stakeholders.

AIFF has stated that the Supreme Court granted stakeholders the opportunity to file objections to the draft constitution. However, the federation’s objections were initially excluded from the compilation by the court-appointed Amicus Curiae. AIFF was subsequently allowed to file its objections on March 19, 2024.

The delay in adopting the new constitution has raised concerns about AIFF’s compliance with FIFA and AFC statutes. AIFF was suspended by FIFA in August 2022 for third-party influence, but the ban was lifted after the federation held elections in September 2022.

FIFA and AFC have reiterated that AIFF’s constitution must be in line with their statutes and approved by the AIFF general body without any interference from third parties. The ongoing legal proceedings and objections from stakeholders have prevented AIFF from finalizing and adopting the new constitution.

Home
Shop
Wishlist0
Back to Top

Search For Products

Product has been added to your cart