IPL's Impact Player Rule Under Review After T20 World Cup

IPL’s Impact Player Rule Under Review After T20 World Cup

The Indian Premier League’s (IPL) “Impact Player” rule, introduced in 2023, has sparked debate. However, BCCI Secretary Jay Shah maintains that the board has received no feedback on the rule and will review it after the T20 World Cup.

Shah emphasized the rule’s benefits, stating that it provides opportunities for two additional Indian players. He highlighted the increased competitiveness it brings to the game. However, he acknowledged that if players express concerns, the board will address them.

“After the IPL and the World Cup, we will have a meeting and decide,” Shah said. “It’s not a permanent rule, nor am I saying we will move past it.”

Shah also clarified that the revival of the Champions League T20 tournament has not been discussed with the ICC, despite claims by Cricket Victoria CEO Nick Cummins.

Regarding speculation about his potential candidacy for ICC chair, Shah remained evasive. “Let me be here in BCCI,” he said. “Let there be speculation. But let me be here (in the BCCI). Am I not doing a good job?”

Impact Player Rule Fuels High-Scoring IPL Matches, Says Shubman Gill

Impact Player Rule Fuels High-Scoring IPL Matches, Says Shubman Gill

Impact Player Rule Fuels High-Scoring IPL Matches, Says Gujarat Titans Captain Shubman Gill

The ongoing Indian Premier League (IPL) season has witnessed a surge in high-scoring matches, with 12 scores exceeding 200 runs. Gujarat Titans captain Shubman Gill believes the Impact Player rule has played a significant role in this trend.

The Impact Player rule allows teams to substitute a player during the match, providing them with an additional option to bolster their batting or bowling lineup. Gill believes this rule gives batters the confidence to play aggressively against bowlers, knowing that they have a cushion in case of wickets falling.

“I think the Impact Player has a bit of a role (in making the matches high scoring),” Gill said after Gujarat Titans’ four-run loss to Delhi Capitals. “Even if you lose extra wickets, there’s an extra cushion for the batters to keep going, and it gives them the license to keep going till the end.”

In the match against Delhi Capitals, Gujarat Titans bowlers initially restricted the opposition to a manageable total. However, Rishabh Pant and Axar Patel’s 113-run partnership turned the tide in Delhi’s favor. Gill admitted that his team gave away a few too many runs in the latter stages of the innings.

“At one stage, we thought we would be able to restrict them around 200-210,” Gill said. “We gave away a few extra runs in the last couple of overs.”

Despite the loss, Gill remains optimistic about Gujarat Titans’ chances in the tournament. He emphasized the importance of execution for bowlers, especially on small grounds where chasing is easier.

“The good thing about chasing is that you know what you are chasing,” Gill said. “It’s a small ground, and it’s chaseable. Execution becomes very important [for bowlers]. If there’s nothing in the wicket for the bowlers, then you have to execute your plans – or your yorkers.”

Gujarat Titans will face Royal Challengers Bengaluru in their next match on Sunday.

Impact Player Rule Debate: Voges Prefers Power Surge Alternative

Impact Player Rule Debate: Voges Prefers Power Surge Alternative

The Indian Premier League (IPL) has been a hotbed of debate regarding the Impact Player substitution rule, introduced last season. Lucknow Super Giants consultant Adam Voges has weighed in on the matter, expressing his preference for a rule similar to the ‘Power Surge’ in the Australian Big Bash League (BBL).

The Impact Player rule allows teams to substitute a player during the match, with the replaced player being ineligible to return. Voges believes this rule detracts from the value of all-rounders, as teams can now bring in a specialist batter or bowler at a crucial stage of the game.

“The scores have been going up, and the teams have got genuine batters coming in at number seven or eight, while the batters have gone hard right from the start,” Voges said. “Certainly makes for entertaining cricket, but it takes the all-rounders out of the game for a little bit and their effectiveness.”

Voges suggests that the Power Surge rule, which allows the batting team to designate a two-over phase with only two fielders outside the circle, would be a more balanced alternative. “I like the Power Surge back at home. It just adds another element to the game,” he said. “While chasing, you never feel like you are out of the game.”

Voges’ comments come after Lucknow Super Giants’ six-wicket victory over defending champions Chennai Super Kings. Marcus Stoinis, promoted to number three in the batting order, played a pivotal role with an unbeaten 124. Voges praised Stoinis’ performance, attributing it to his success as a top-order batter in the BBL.

The dew factor also played a significant role in the match, with Voges acknowledging that it was a good toss to win. “At the halfway stage, we could feel the dew on the outfield, and it played a part in the back end of the game. In the end, it was a good toss to win,” he said.

Despite the challenges posed by the dew, Lucknow Super Giants executed their plans effectively, with Stoinis’ innings proving to be the match-winner. “It was a tremendous game of cricket. The batting from both sides was outstanding,” Voges said. “CSK did put us under pressure with the ball, but it was our best night execution-wise. We needed someone to stand up, and Stoinis played an outstanding innings.”

Impact Player Rule Sparks Controversy Among Indian Cricketers

Impact Player Rule Sparks Controversy Among Indian Cricketers

The Impact Player rule, introduced in the 2023 Indian Premier League (IPL), has sparked controversy among Indian cricketers. Delhi Capitals allrounder Axar Patel and teammate Mukesh Kumar have joined India captain Rohit Sharma in expressing concerns about the rule’s impact on allrounders and bowlers.

Axar believes that the rule has affected his batting position, as teams prioritize using a specialist batsman as the Impact Player. “As an allrounder, I know that they will either take a proper batsman or a bowler, not an allrounder,” he said.

Mukesh, a fast bowler, argues that the rule is unfair to bowlers, as it provides no respite even if they dismiss four batters quickly. “With 12 players, even if four wickets are down, the next player is not scared of getting out or making the team stable, they come and play their shots,” he said.

David Warner, Axar’s teammate, acknowledges that the rule has diminished the role of allrounders but sees it as an opportunity for captains to adapt tactically. “We are adapting as cricketers, so we’re enjoying that and and it’s also tactically when you’re sitting on the bench, you know, if you’re not scoring runs, then you can put that batsman in,” he said.

Michael Hussey, Chennai Super Kings’ batting coach, believes the rule has made IPL games more entertaining but admits it can be challenging for bowlers. “It’s hard for bowlers, especially if the conditions are good for batting because the batting orders are lengthened and batsmen have more freedom to come out and continue to go hard,” he said.

The Impact Player rule has sparked a debate about the balance between entertainment and fairness in cricket. While it has added an element of unpredictability and excitement to the IPL, it remains to be seen whether it will have a long-term impact on the development of allrounders and the role of bowlers in T20 cricket.

IPL’s “Impact Player” Rule Under Review After Mixed Reactions

The “impact player” rule, introduced in the Indian Premier League (IPL) in 2023, has sparked a debate among cricket experts. While some believe it adds excitement to the game, others argue that it undermines the role of all-rounders.

IPL chairman Arun Dhumal has acknowledged the mixed reactions to the rule, stating that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is open to reviewing it after the current season. “We will definitely look into it and discuss with all parties involved,” Dhumal said.

The rule allows teams to substitute a player from their bench with an “impact player” at any point during the match. This player can be used as a batter, bowler, or fielder, providing teams with tactical flexibility.

However, critics argue that the rule marginalizes all-rounders, who are now less likely to get a chance to bowl or bat. India captain Rohit Sharma, who plays for Mumbai Indians in the IPL, has expressed his concerns about the impact on all-rounders.

“I am not a big fan of the impact sub rule,” Sharma said. “It is going to hold all-rounders back. Cricket is played by 11 players, not 12. You are taking so much from the game to make it entertaining for people around.”

Sharma believes that the rule gives teams an unfair advantage if they bat well and don’t lose wickets, as they can add another bowler to their lineup. He also argues that it reduces the importance of the No. 7 and No. 8 batters.

Despite the concerns raised by Sharma and others, Dhumal emphasized that the BCCI is open to feedback and will consider all perspectives before making a decision on the future of the rule.

Impact Player Rule: Ponting Weighs Pros and Cons

Impact Player Rule: Ponting Weighs Pros and Cons

The Impact Player rule, introduced in the 2023 Indian Premier League (IPL) season, has sparked mixed reactions among coaches and players. While some welcome the tactical flexibility it offers, others, including Delhi Capitals head coach Ricky Ponting, have expressed concerns.

Ponting acknowledges that the rule has led to higher scores and more explosive batting, as teams can bring in a 12th player as a substitute. However, he admits that it can be a “nightmare” for coaches who must now select two teams and consider various combinations.

Ponting agrees with India captain Rohit Sharma’s assessment that the Impact Player rule may hinder the development of all-rounders. He believes that it would be easier for coaches to simply select their best XI and avoid the complexities of the rule.

Despite his reservations, Ponting recognizes that the Impact Player has made the IPL a more entertaining spectacle for viewers. He points to the record-breaking match between Sunrisers Hyderabad and Royal Challengers Bangalore, where 549 runs were scored.

“If the Impact Player is making it a better spectacle, then it should stay,” Ponting said. “More runs are being scored, and people are mesmerized by the cricket.”

However, Ponting emphasizes that the rule should be evaluated based on public feedback. If viewers find it confusing or detrimental to the overall quality of the game, it may need to be reconsidered.

Rohit Sharma Questions 'Impact Player' Rule Ahead of T20 World Cup

Rohit Sharma Questions ‘Impact Player’ Rule Ahead of T20 World Cup

Rohit Sharma Expresses Concerns Over ‘Impact Player’ Rule Ahead of T20 World Cup

Mumbai Indians captain Rohit Sharma has voiced his reservations about the ‘impact player’ rule introduced in the Indian Premier League (IPL), stating that it could have detrimental effects on Team India’s preparations for the upcoming T20 World Cup.

The ‘impact player’ rule allows teams to substitute a player from their bench after the first innings, providing them with an additional tactical option. However, Rohit believes that this rule could hinder the development of all-rounders, who are crucial for India’s success in the shortest format.

“I am not a big fan of the Impact sub rule,” Rohit said in a recent podcast. “It is going to hold all-rounders back. Eventually, cricket is played by 11 players, not 12. You are taking so much from the game to make it entertaining for people around.”

Rohit pointed out that all-rounders like Shivam Dube and Washington Sundar are not getting enough bowling opportunities due to the ‘impact player’ rule. This, he believes, could be a major concern for India ahead of the T20 World Cup, where all-rounders play a pivotal role.

“If you look just from the cricketing aspect of it, I feel guys like Shivam Dube and Washington Sundar aren’t getting to bowl, which for us is not a good thing,” Rohit said. “I don’t know what you can do about it. There are 12 players for you, it is entertaining, you can bring on the impact player after watching how the game is going, how the pitch is behaving.”

Rohit’s concerns were echoed by former Australian wicketkeeper Adam Gilchrist, who co-hosted the podcast. Gilchrist expressed concerns that the ‘impact player’ rule could compromise the integrity of cricket for the sake of entertainment.

“I think it has added something special,” Gilchrist said. “It’s all built for spectators and for their entertainment. But you are compromising the fundamental of cricket. Why T20 was so entertaining, because you were not compromising with the integrity of cricket.”

Gilchrist pointed out that the number of high-scoring matches in the IPL has increased significantly since the introduction of the ‘impact player’ rule, suggesting that it may be encouraging teams to take more risks and play more aggressively.

“It is 11 vs 11, same size field, the field restrictions are also the same,” Gilchrist said. “There was no gimmick needed. I think it is a bit concerning.”

Rohit and Gilchrist’s concerns highlight the potential impact of the ‘impact player’ rule on the development of all-rounders and the overall balance of the game. As Team India prepares for the T20 World Cup, it remains to be seen whether the rule will have a positive or negative effect on their chances of success.

IPL Impact Player Rule: A Boon for Batting, a Bane for All-Rounders?

IPL Impact Player Rule: A Boon for Batting, a Bane for All-Rounders?

The introduction of the Impact Player rule in IPL 2024 has significantly altered the dynamics of the tournament, effectively transforming it into a 12-a-side contest. While the rule has led to higher scores, it raises concerns about its impact on the development of all-rounders in Indian cricket.

Jos Buttler’s recent match-winning performance as an Impact Player for Rajasthan Royals highlights the rule’s potential. However, it also underscores the fact that teams are prioritizing batting over all-round ability. Players like Rahul Tewatia and Shivam Dube, who possess bowling skills, have been relegated to specialist batting roles.

This trend is particularly concerning given India’s historical struggles in producing all-rounders. The IPL was once seen as a platform to nurture such players, but the Impact Player rule has removed the incentive for teams to invest in their development.

Ravindra Jadeja remains the only genuine all-rounder in Indian cricket who is consistently utilized in both batting and bowling roles in the IPL. Hardik Pandya’s reluctance to bowl and Krunal Pandya’s limited batting opportunities further highlight the dearth of all-rounders.

The absence of all-rounders in the IPL has implications for the Indian team’s performance in international tournaments like the T20 World Cup. The lack of players who can contribute with both bat and ball limits the team’s tactical flexibility and adaptability.

The Impact Player rule has undoubtedly made the IPL more entertaining, but it has also raised questions about its long-term impact on Indian cricket. The tournament must strike a balance between providing entertainment and fostering the development of all-rounders, who are crucial for the success of the national team.

Home
Shop
Wishlist0
Back to Top

Search For Products

Product has been added to your cart