IOA President Accuses AIFF Chief of Impersonation and Unauthorized Agenda

IOA President Accuses AIFF Chief of Impersonation and Unauthorized Agenda

PT Usha, the esteemed president of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA), has raised grave concerns regarding the conduct of All India Football Federation (AIFF) president Kalyan Chaubey. Usha alleges that Chaubey has “impersonated as the acting CEO of the IOA” and issued an “unauthorised agenda” for the Special General Meeting (SGM).

Bhaichung Bhutia, a legendary former India forward, has expressed his dismay over the situation, stating that the credibility of the AIFF has plummeted under Chaubey’s leadership. Bhutia believes that Chaubey’s actions have damaged the reputation of the IOA as well.

“I feel sorry for PT Usha ma’am and the IOA,” Bhutia said. “We have all seen what Kalyan Chaubey has done to the football federation. The credibility of the federation has taken a huge hit during his tenure.”

Bhutia highlighted a series of questionable decisions made by Chaubey, including withdrawing India’s bid to host the Asia Cup and awarding it to Saudi Arabia, as well as moving the Santosh Trophy to Saudi Arabia. He also criticized Chaubey’s comments about North Eastern players being too short.

“These are all very dumb statements that he’s making,” Bhutia said. “He’s already ruined the Football Federation, and now he’s trying to damage the Indian Olympic Association as well.”

Usha’s allegations stem from a circular issued by Chaubey on official IOA letterhead, listing 26 agenda items for the SGM to be held on October 25. One of the items was a vote of no confidence against Usha, and Chaubey signed the circular as IOA’s joint secretary and acting CEO. However, Usha maintains that Chaubey does not hold the acting CEO’s post.

Bhutia believes that Chaubey should step down from his position and call for elections in light of the corruption allegations that have surfaced.

“You have a lawyer (Nilanjan Bhattacharjee) of the federation accusing him of corruption; you have the former general secretary (Shaji Prabhakaran), who was appointed by you and then removed within a couple of months, putting serious accusations on the president,” Bhutia said. “When you have those kinds of allegations, it’s time to step down, accept the new constitutions, and call the elections.”

The AIFF’s former principal legal advisor, Nilanjan Bhattacharjee, has previously made serious “corruption allegations” against Chaubey. In a letter addressed to PM Narendra Modi, Bhattacharjee raised concerns about Chaubey’s non-transparent tender process, preferential allotment of tenders, and attempts to “syphon off money from the federation’s exchequer.” Bhattacharjee’s contract was later terminated by Chaubey.

IOA Sponsorship Deal with RIL Under Fire, Loss of ₹24 Crore Alleged

IOA Sponsorship Deal with RIL Under Fire, Loss of ₹24 Crore Alleged

The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) has been embroiled in a controversy over its sponsorship agreement with Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), which has been deemed “faulty” by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG). The CAG report alleges that the IOA has incurred a loss of ₹24 crore by granting RIL additional rights to four more Games (Winter Olympics 2026, 2030 and Youth Olympic Games 2026, 2030) at the same cost.

As per the initial agreement, RIL was made the principal partner till 2028 for ₹35 crore for the Asian Games (2022, 2026), Commonwealth Games (2024, 2028), and Olympics (2024 Paris and 2028 Los Angeles). However, the CAG report found that the IOA extended the tenure of the agreement to 2030 without any additional consideration.

IOA treasurer Sahdev Yadav has expressed concerns that the “potential value of such a deal would be considerably higher than what was proposed and agreed upon in the renegotiated agreement with RIL.” He also highlighted that India’s bid to host the 2030 Youth Olympic Games, whose sponsorship rights were given to RIL for free, could lead to a potential loss of over ₹100 crore.

President PT Usha has defended the deal, stating that the Executive Council members were part of the discussion during the renegotiation process. However, Yadav has refuted this claim, stating that even sponsorship committee chairman Rohit Rajpal had not given his consent.

The controversy has escalated, with the IOA accusing Yadav of being responsible for the IOC not releasing financial grants. Yadav has countered that the financial reports are meant to be signed by the president, CEO, and treasurer, and that he cannot sign on reports when the CEO’s appointment has not been ratified.

The IOC has expressed concerns over the ongoing governance issues within the IOA, particularly the obstruction to the ratification of the CEO’s appointment. The IOC has emphasized that this has hindered the IOA’s ability to function effectively.

IOA Loses Olympic Solidarity Grants Amid Internal Disputes

IOA Loses Olympic Solidarity Grants Amid Internal Disputes

The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) is facing a financial crisis after the International Olympic Committee (IOC) suspended its Olympic Solidarity grants due to ongoing internal disputes and governance issues. The IOC’s decision was communicated to the IOA in a letter on October 8, citing “reciprocal allegations” within the Executive Council.

Olympic Solidarity provides funding to National Olympic Committees (NOCs) for athlete development programs. The suspension of these grants will significantly impact the IOA’s ability to support Indian athletes, threatening their preparation for upcoming international competitions.

The IOA has blamed its treasurer, Sahdev Yadav, for the IOC’s decision, accusing him of failing to file the necessary annual financial reports. Yadav has denied these allegations, claiming that the president, PT Usha, has compromised the IOA’s assets by unilaterally agreeing to an amended sponsorship agreement with Reliance India Limited (RIL).

The ongoing feud between Usha and 12 Executive Council members over the appointment of Raghuram Iyer as CEO has further hindered the IOA’s ability to function effectively. A Special General Body meeting has been summoned on October 25 to address these issues.

The IOC has urged all concerned parties to resolve the governance issues in accordance with the IOA Constitution and the Olympic Charter. However, the ongoing internal disputes and allegations have raised concerns about the IOA’s ability to effectively manage its affairs and support Indian athletes.

IOA President PT Usha Faces No-Confidence Motion from Executive Committee

IOA President PT Usha Faces No-Confidence Motion from Executive Committee

The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) is embroiled in a power struggle, with 12 of its 15 executive committee members planning to move a motion of no confidence against president PT Usha at a Special General Meeting (SGM) on October 25.

The rift between Usha and the EC members has escalated, leading to a 26-point agenda for the SGM. The agenda includes discussions on Usha’s functioning, conduct, non-compliance with the IOA constitution, and failure to convene an Annual General Meeting.

The EC members also allege that Usha has “pressurized the finance committee to approve unauthorized expenses related to her.” The agenda’s final point is a “vote of no confidence against the president.”

The agenda also includes a detailed discussion on sponsorship agreements executed by Usha without consulting the sponsorship committee or the executive council. Usha has faced scrutiny after a Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report observed a loss of ₹24 crore to IOA due to Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) being given four extra events without any extra price.

Usha has defended her actions, claiming that the EC members were aware of the negotiations with RIL and that it was done to protect the rights fee payable by the company. However, the EC members have objected to Usha’s unilateral decisions and have accused her of violating the constitution.

The dispute has also centered around the appointment of Raghuram Iyer as CEO. The EC members have objected to his pay package and have brought back joint secretary Kalyan Chaubey as acting CEO. Usha has called an SGM to discuss the dispute and put it to a vote.

The agenda also includes matters related to corruption and complaints against some EC members regarding their ineligibility to hold office. The EC members have accused Usha of non-compliance with constitutional mandates and unilateral decision-making.

The showdown between Usha and the EC members has reached a critical point, with the motion of no confidence potentially leading to her removal as president.

Uttarakhand to Host 38th National Games in 2025

Uttarakhand to Host 38th National Games in 2025

The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) has announced that the 38th edition of the National Games will be held in Uttarakhand from January 28 to February 14, 2025. The Games will feature competitions in 38 sports, with over 10,000 athletes, officials, and coaches expected to participate.

The IOA and the Government of Uttarakhand are working closely to ensure that the Games will be an exceptional experience for all involved. Venues are being constructed and upgraded to international standards, and necessary logistical arrangements are being made to accommodate participants and visitors.

The picturesque state of Uttarakhand, known for its natural beauty and rich culture, is preparing to host the multi-disciplinary event for the first time. Chief Minister of Uttarakhand, Pushkar Singh Dhami, expressed his gratitude to the IOA for entrusting the state with the responsibility of hosting the Games, stating, “We are committed to delivering a world-class sporting experience. The National Games will not only be a celebration of sports but also a showcase of Uttarakhand’s rich culture and hospitality.”

The National Games provide a vital platform for athletes from all over the country to showcase their talents and continue their journey towards international sporting success. IOA chief PT Usha said, “We are thrilled to bring the National Games to Uttarakhand, a state that has shown remarkable enthusiasm and commitment to hosting this prestigious event.”

The State Government has initiated significant infrastructure development projects to ensure the success of the event. Venues are being constructed and upgraded to international standards, and necessary logistical arrangements are being made to accommodate participants and visitors.

The 38th National Games are expected to be a major sporting event, showcasing the best of Indian athletic talent. The Games will also provide a boost to the economy of Uttarakhand, as well as promote tourism in the state.

IOA President PT Usha Defends Sponsorship Renegotiation, Accuses EC Members of Obstruction

IOA President PT Usha Defends Sponsorship Renegotiation, Accuses EC Members of Obstruction

Indian Olympic Association (IOA) President PT Usha has defended her decision to renegotiate the sponsorship agreement with Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), stating that executive committee members were aware and involved in the discussions.

Usha’s actions came under scrutiny after a Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report alleged a loss of ₹24 crore to IOA due to RIL being granted four additional events without extra payment. However, Usha claims that the renegotiation was necessary to protect the rights fee of ₹35 crore payable by RIL.

According to Usha, RIL sought to reduce the rights fee by 50% after the International Olympic Committee (IOC) clarified that sponsor branding at the India House during the Paris Olympics would be limited to the inside of the NOC House. This would have deprived RIL of significant brand mileage.

Usha convened a meeting with RIL representatives and Rohit Rajpal, Chairman of IOA’s sponsorship committee, on September 20, 2023, to discuss the options. These included terminating the sponsorship agreement, accepting the 50% reduction in rights fee, or negotiating with RIL to ensure the establishment of the NOC House at Paris and protect future cash flow.

Usha maintains that all EC members, including Kalyan Chaubey, were informed of the discussions and were part of the decision-making process. She also highlights that Rajpal had spoken to RIL directly.

Usha’s comments come amid ongoing tensions with EC members over the appointment of Raghu Iyer as CEO. The EC has objected to Iyer’s pay package and has not ratified his appointment. Usha has called an SGM later this month to address the matter.

Usha expressed frustration with the EC’s behavior, accusing them of creating problems and attempting to “usurp power.” She cited examples of EC members seeking inappropriate positions and privileges, such as becoming Ski and Snowboard Chairman despite having no experience in winter sports.

Despite the challenges, Usha remains optimistic that the impasse will be resolved and that preparations for the Paris Olympics and India’s bid for the 2036 Olympics will not be affected.

IOA Chief Slams Vinesh Phogat for Blaming Association for Olympic Disqualification

IOA Chief Slams Vinesh Phogat for Blaming Association for Olympic Disqualification

Indian Olympic Association (IOA) President PT Usha has strongly criticized former wrestler Vinesh Phogat for blaming the association for her disqualification from the Paris Olympics. Usha asserted that the responsibility lies with Phogat’s team, not the IOA.

Phogat, who recently entered politics and won her debut election in Haryana, had accused the IOA of mishandling her disqualification. However, Usha refuted these claims, stating that the IOA had provided Phogat with all the necessary support.

“She was a sportsperson. She should carry the qualities of a sportsman,” Usha said. “We all wanted medals from her. After meeting her, we went to the World Wrestling Federation president to protest. They said, ‘rules are rules.'”

Usha emphasized that Phogat’s team was aware of the weight regulations and should have taken appropriate measures to ensure compliance. “For us, it’s new, only 100 gms, but for them it is not new. This had happened earlier as well so she should know what to do, and how to tackle it,” Usha said.

Phogat was disqualified from the 50kg category women’s freestyle final for being 100 gm overweight in the second weigh-in. She challenged the verdict in the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) but was unsuccessful.

Usha expressed disappointment that Phogat had chosen to criticize the IOA instead of acknowledging her own team’s shortcomings. “It is not our or our sport science doctor’s fault, it is her and her team’s fault but still, she criticises us,” Usha said.

Phogat’s disqualification ended her hopes of becoming the first woman Indian wrestler to win silver or gold in the Olympics. She announced her retirement from the sport shortly after the incident.

CAG Audit Reveals Irregularities in IOA's Sponsorship Agreement with RIL

CAG Audit Reveals Irregularities in IOA’s Sponsorship Agreement with RIL

The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has released an audit report highlighting irregularities in the Indian Olympic Association’s (IOA) sponsorship agreement with Reliance India Limited (RIL). The report alleges that the agreement has resulted in undue favoritism towards RIL and a loss of ₹24 crore to the IOA.

Under the terms of the agreement, signed on August 1, 2022, RIL was granted the right to associate with the IOA as the Official Principal Partner for various sporting events, including the Asian Games, Commonwealth Games, and the Olympics. The agreement also gave RIL the exclusive rights to construct and showcase the ‘India House’ during these events.

However, the CAG report reveals that an amended agreement on December 5, 2023, granted RIL additional rights for the Winter Olympic Games and Youth Olympic Games without any corresponding increase in the consideration amount. The report states that the IOA should have raised the consideration amount from ₹35 crore to ₹59 crore, as the rights for six games were originally valued at ₹35 crore, or an average of ₹6 crore per game.

The report concludes that the “faulty agreement” with RIL has resulted in a loss of ₹24 crore to the IOA and undue favoritism towards the sponsor. The IOA president, PT Usha, has been asked to respond to the CAG’s findings.

IOA executive assistant Ajay Kumar Narang defended the agreement, claiming that it had to be renegotiated due to a flaw in the tender. He stated that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) had changed its conditions regarding sponsor naming rights, which necessitated additional compensation for RIL.

However, IOA treasurer Sahdev Yadav expressed concern that the executive council and sponsorship committee were not consulted during the amendment process. He questioned the authority of the president to make such changes and alleged that the agreement had led to a significant financial loss for the IOA.

The CAG’s report has raised serious questions about the transparency and accountability of the IOA’s sponsorship agreements. It remains to be seen how the IOA will respond to the allegations and whether any corrective measures will be taken to prevent similar irregularities in the future.

IOA President PT Usha Calls Special Meeting to Address Controversial Issues

IOA President PT Usha Calls Special Meeting to Address Controversial Issues

Indian Olympic Association (IOA) President PT Usha has called for a Special General Meeting (SGM) on October 25 to address pressing issues that have divided the organization. The meeting will focus on the contentious appointment of CEO Raghuram Iyer, allegations of corruption against treasurer Sahdev Yadav, and the eligibility of certain Executive Council (EC) members.

Usha has faced resistance from a majority of EC members on these matters. Iyer’s appointment has been particularly contentious due to concerns over his pay package and suitability for the role. Usha maintains that the CEO is crucial for the smooth functioning of the IOA and has warned that delays in his appointment could jeopardize India’s bid to host the 2036 Summer Olympics.

The SGM will also address allegations that some EC members are ineligible to hold office due to age and tenure restrictions outlined in the National Sports Code. The anonymous complaint has raised concerns about the validity of their positions.

Usha’s call for the SGM follows a heated confrontation with the EC on September 26, where members reiterated their opposition to Iyer’s appointment. The meeting will be held in a hybrid format, allowing both physical and virtual attendance.

Iyer, a former CEO of IPL teams Rajasthan Royals and Lucknow Super Giants, has also held administrative roles in the Indian Super League and Ultimate Table Tennis. His appointment has been met with resistance from EC members who question his qualifications and the high salary package offered to him.

The SGM will provide a platform for the IOA to address these contentious issues and reach a consensus. The outcome of the meeting will have significant implications for the organization’s governance and its ability to prepare for major sporting events, including the potential bid for the 2036 Olympics.

IOA Internal Feud Escalates, IOC Intervenes

IOA Internal Feud Escalates, IOC Intervenes

The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) has been embroiled in a bitter internal feud, with President PT Usha and most of the executive council (EC) members engaged in a public showdown. The turmoil has escalated to the International Olympic Committee (IOC), which has urged the IOA to address its governance issues.

Usha has accused the EC members of non-cooperation, claiming that they have blocked funds for athlete preparation and prevented the organization of a felicitation ceremony for Paris Olympics medalists. However, IOA treasurer Sahdev Yadav has vehemently denied these allegations, calling them “blatant lies.”

Yadav asserts that Usha has not consulted with EC members or made any official proposals for the felicitation ceremony. He also claims that all proposals approved by the EC and finance committee have been paid promptly.

The conflict intensified after the EC refused to ratify Raghu Iyer’s appointment as CEO. Usha claims that Iyer’s appointment was approved in a January 2024 meeting, but the EC members dispute this, stating that they have rejected his nomination.

The EC has circulated a separate meeting minutes, assigning the CEO’s duties to joint secretary Kalyan Chaubey. Usha has dismissed these minutes as invalid, accusing the EC of resisting Iyer’s appointment since their tenure began in December 2022.

The IOC has expressed concern over the ongoing infighting and has asked the IOA to resolve its internal issues. The organization has sent a special invitee to EC meetings to monitor the situation.

The feud has cast a shadow over the IOA’s preparations for the Paris Olympics. Athletes and officials have expressed concern that the internal turmoil could affect India’s performance at the Games.

Home
Shop
Wishlist0
Back to Top

Search For Products

Product has been added to your cart