Riyan Parag's Bizarre No-Ball: A Unique Moment in T20I Cricket

Riyan Parag’s Bizarre No-Ball: A Unique Moment in T20I Cricket

Riyan Parag’s Bizarre No-Ball: A Rare Occurrence in T20I Cricket

In the second T20I between India and Bangladesh, a peculiar incident occurred when Riyan Parag’s delivery was called a no-ball for an unusual reason. During the 11th over of Bangladesh’s innings, Parag attempted to surprise the batters with a bizarre sling action, reminiscent of former India batter Kedar Jadhav’s wide action. However, the tactic backfired as Parag’s back foot stepped outside the pitch tramlines, resulting in a no-ball.

According to Law 21.5 of the cricket rules set by the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC), the bowler’s back foot must land within the return crease and not touch the tramlines. Parag’s foot not only landed outside the tramline but also outside the pitch altogether, prompting the umpire to signal a no-ball.

Despite the setback, Parag quickly recovered and returned to his normal action on the free hit, preventing Mahmudullah from scoring any additional runs. Two balls later, he dismissed Mehidy Hasan Miraz with a catch in the deep.

Parag also made a valuable contribution to India’s batting innings, scoring 15 runs off just six balls, including two sixes. His cameo helped India reach a formidable total of 221 in 20 overs, putting pressure on the Bangladesh bowlers.

Rare Wicket-Keeper No-Ball Costs Northamptonshire in T20 Blast

Rare Wicket-Keeper No-Ball Costs Northamptonshire in T20 Blast

Wicket-Keeper No-Ball: A Rare Occurrence in Cricket

In a rare turn of events, Northamptonshire wicket-keeper Lewis McManus committed a no-ball in a Vitality T20 Blast match against Somerset. The incident occurred when Somerset’s Tom Kohler-Cadmore was on strike and McManus appealed for a stumping. However, replays revealed that McManus’ gloves had crossed the line of the stumps before he collected the ball, prompting the third umpire to call a no-ball.

According to Law 27.3.1 and 27.3.2 set by the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC), the wicket-keeper must remain wholly behind the wicket at the striker’s end until the ball comes into play or until the striker attempts a run. In this case, McManus’ gloves were ahead of the stumps before any of these conditions were met, resulting in the no-ball call.

The no-ball proved costly for Northamptonshire, as Kohler-Cadmore slammed the free-hit into the stands for six. He went on to score 63 runs, helping Somerset post a total of 215 in 20 overs. Northamptonshire fell 17 runs short in their chase.

This type of no-ball is uncommon in cricket, as wicket-keepers are typically careful to avoid crossing the line of the stumps. However, it serves as a reminder of the importance of adhering to the laws of the game.

Rare No-Ball in T20 Blast Highlights Wicket-Keeping Concerns

Rare No-Ball in T20 Blast Highlights Wicket-Keeping Concerns

Rare No-Ball in T20 Blast Quarter-Final Raises Questions About Wicket-Keeping Standards

During a T20 Blast quarter-final match between Somerset and Northamptonshire on September 5, a rare incident occurred that highlighted the importance of precise wicket-keeping. In the first innings, Somerset batter Lewis Gregory was deceived by Northamptonshire’s left-arm orthodox spinner, Saif Zaib. The ball beat Gregory’s outside edge, and wicketkeeper Lewis McManus attempted to stump him. However, upon review, it was determined that McManus had crossed the line of the stumps before collecting the ball, resulting in a no-ball.

This incident brought attention to Article 27.3.1 of the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) Laws of Cricket, which states that the wicket-keeper must remain wholly behind the wicket at the striker’s end until the ball touches the bat or person of the striker, passes the wicket, or the striker attempts a run. McManus’s failure to adhere to this rule resulted in a reprieve for Gregory.

The incident also raised questions about the overall standards of wicket-keeping in the game. Some experts believe that the increasing emphasis on athleticism and agility in wicket-keepers may be compromising their ability to maintain their position behind the stumps.

Mills Frustrated by Archer’s Absence from Blast Finals Day

In other T20 Blast news, Sussex captain Tymal Mills expressed his frustration over the unavailability of star pacer Jofra Archer for the Blast Finals Day. The Finals Day will feature the two semi-finals and final played back-to-back at Edgbaston on September 14. However, England will be involved in a three-match home T20I series against Australia during that period.

Mills believes it is “pretty stupid” that England players will not be released for the Blast Finals Day, especially considering the importance of the tournament. He said, “Whoever comes in for him (Archer) will have big boots to fill.”

England Players to Miss Blast Finals Day

According to ESPNcricinfo, the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) is working through scenarios, but players will only be released if they are not needed for the final two matches of the T20I series against Australia.

Surrey will be the most affected team, with all-rounder Jamie Overton called up by England as injury cover. He will join Sam Curran, Will Jacks, and Reece Topley in the T20I squad. Surrey is also waiting for confirmation of the availability of their four-Test players, including Gus Atkinson, Dan Lawrence, Ollie Pope, and Jamie Smith.

Warwickshire will also miss the presence of uncapped all-rounders Dan Mousley and Jacob Bethell, who are also in England’s T20I squad.

Kohli's Controversial Dismissal Sparks Umpiring Debate in IPL 2024

Kohli’s Controversial Dismissal Sparks Umpiring Debate in IPL 2024

Virat Kohli’s Controversial Dismissal Sparks Umpiring Debate in IPL 2024

Since Sunday’s match between Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) and Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR), the dismissal of Virat Kohli has become a major talking point in the Indian Premier League (IPL). Kohli was caught and bowled by Harshit Rana, but the legality of the delivery has been questioned.

Kohli was convinced that the full toss was a no-ball, as it appeared to be above his waist height. The former RCB captain expressed his frustration by shouting at the umpire, which resulted in a 50% match fee fine.

Replays showed that the ball was dipping, and if Kohli had been standing at his normal batting position, it would have ended up below his waist. However, Kohli was standing outside his crease, which led to the dismissal.

The incident has sparked a debate about umpiring standards in the IPL. Former Indian cricketer Mohammad Kaif took to Instagram to criticize the umpiring, stating that “clear unplayable beamer gets Kohli out and a ball that passed under Dhoni’s bat declared wide.” Kohli himself liked Kaif’s post.

The IPL has released a statement regarding Kohli’s punishment, stating that he breached the IPL Code of Conduct by showing dissent. Kohli admitted to the offense and accepted the Match Referee’s sanction.

The incident has highlighted the importance of accurate umpiring in cricket. With the use of technology, such as the Decision Review System (DRS), there is less room for error. However, the human element remains, and mistakes can still occur.

The debate over Kohli’s dismissal is likely to continue, as fans and experts alike question the decision-making of the umpires. It is crucial for the IPL to ensure that umpiring standards are maintained at the highest level to preserve the integrity of the competition.

Hawk-Eye Technology Debuts in IPL to Determine No-Balls for Height

Hawk-Eye Technology Debuts in IPL to Determine No-Balls for Height

Hawk-Eye Technology Debuts in IPL to Determine No-Balls for Height

The Indian Premier League (IPL) has introduced a new Hawk-Eye technology to objectively determine no-balls for height, eliminating the subjective element in umpiring decisions. This technology made its debut during Virat Kohli’s dismissal in Royal Challengers Bangalore’s (RCB) chase against Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) at Eden Gardens on Sunday.

Kohli was dismissed for 18 off 7 balls, caught and bowled off a high full toss from Harshit Rana in the third over. The delivery appeared to be dipping on the batter, even though it was above the waist height when Kohli made contact with it.

The TV umpire, Michael Gough, checked the legality of the delivery using the Hawk-Eye ball tracking technology. The technology revealed that the ball would have passed the batter at 0.92 meters from the ground if he was upright at the crease. Kohli’s waist height has been measured at 1.04 meters, which means the ball would have passed below his waist had he been on his crease, making it a legal delivery.

Kohli expressed his dissatisfaction with the decision, arguing that it should have been a no-ball for height. However, the technology confirmed that the delivery was within the legal limits.

The IPL has implemented this technology to remove the subjectivity in adjudicating no-balls above the waist. The system measures the height of the ball as it passes the batter at the popping crease and compares it to the toe-to-waist height of the batter when in an upright position. If the ball is higher than the batter’s waist, it is declared a no-ball.

In Kohli’s case, the projected trajectory of the ball would have taken it 0.12 meters below his waist had he been upright on his crease. Therefore, the delivery was deemed legal.

The introduction of Hawk-Eye technology for no-ball height determination is a significant step towards improving the accuracy and consistency of umpiring decisions in the IPL. It eliminates the potential for human error and ensures that batters are not unfairly dismissed due to subjective interpretations of the rules.

Home
Shop
Wishlist0
Back to Top

Search For Products

Product has been added to your cart