IOA Executive Council Meeting to Address Contentious Issues, Including Alleged Threats by President

IOA Executive Council Meeting to Address Contentious Issues, Including Alleged Threats by President

The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) is set for a contentious executive council meeting in New Delhi on Thursday, with members adding several contentious items to the agenda. The meeting comes amid escalating tensions between IOA president PT Usha and treasurer Sahdev Yadav.

One of the key issues on the agenda is the alleged “threatening letters” issued by Usha to executive committee members. The council will also discuss the scope of Usha’s powers under the IOA Constitution and consider reporting her conduct to the IOA Ethics Commission.

The meeting will also address issues related to the recent Paris Olympics, including sponsorship details, additional expenses incurred, and the accreditation process. The selection of Sportsperson of Outstanding Merit (SOM) in November 2022 and their participation in IOA elections will also be discussed.

The meeting was called by 12 council members, including senior vice president Ajay Patel, vice-president Rajalaxmi Singh Deo, and former Olympic medallist Gagan Narang. Notably, boxer M C Mary Kom and table tennis player A Sharath Kamal, who are on the IOA athletes commission, did not sign the document.

The growing tensions between Usha and Yadav stem from a show cause notice issued by Usha to Yadav, challenging his eligibility to hold the post of treasurer. Yadav has threatened legal action against Usha for “defaming” his image.

The IOA meeting is expected to be heated, with members likely to express their concerns and seek clarification on various issues. The outcome of the meeting could have significant implications for the future of the IOA and its leadership.

IOA Crisis Deepens as Usha and EC Members Trade Accusations

IOA Crisis Deepens as Usha and EC Members Trade Accusations

The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) is embroiled in a deepening crisis as President PT Usha and members of the executive committee (EC) engage in a bitter exchange of accusations.

Usha had issued notices to five EC members on September 10, alleging that they held positions in violation of the IOA constitution and Sports Code. Vice-president and EC member Rajlaxmi Singh Deo has retaliated, questioning Usha’s own election as IOA president.

Deo claims that Usha’s “Proposer” and “Seconder” for her nomination were not approved by the IOA General Body, rendering her election “illegal.” She cites the IOA Constitution, which outlines the process for nominating and electing Sportspersons of Outstanding Merit (SOM) to the EC.

Deo has invited Usha to respond to her allegations, which she has shared with the Sports Minister and the International Olympic Committee. Usha was elected IOA president in December 2022, becoming one of eight SOMs selected by the Athletes Commission.

The crisis within the IOA stems from the appointment of CEO Raghu Ram Iyer in January. Usha and the majority of the EC oppose the appointment, leading to a power struggle that has escalated after the Paris Olympics.

Besides Deo, EC members Ajay Patel, Sahdev Yadav, Bhupinder Singh Bajwa, and Alaknanda Ashok have been accused of violating the Sports Code. Deo has criticized Usha for acting on an “anonymous” letter and failing to investigate the complainant’s veracity.

She has accused Usha of malicious intent, aiming to silence EC members who have raised concerns about her alleged violations of the IOA constitution. The ongoing turmoil has severely impacted the functioning of the IOA, casting a shadow over its preparations for future sporting events.

IOA Conflict Delays Scholarship Funds for Winter Olympian Arif Khan

IOA Conflict Delays Scholarship Funds for Winter Olympian Arif Khan

The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) is embroiled in a bitter internal conflict that is having a detrimental impact on athletes. Winter Olympian Arif Khan’s training for the 2026 Winter Olympics has been severely disrupted due to the IOA finance committee’s refusal to release scholarship funds provided by the International Olympic Committee (IOC).

Under the Olympic Solidarity funding program, the IOC approved a $6,000 scholarship for Khan’s preparation for the Milano Cortina Games and transferred the funds to IOA on May 8. However, the finance committee, headed by Sr. Vice President Ajay Patel, has inexplicably withheld the funds.

IOA President PT Usha has expressed her frustration in a letter to IOC officials, requesting that the amount be transferred directly to Khan’s account. She has also questioned the finance committee’s decision to challenge Khan’s selection for the scholarship program.

The conflict within the IOA has escalated since the appointment of CEO Raghu Iyer in January. The majority of executive committee members and Usha have been at odds, leading to a breakdown in governance and financial management.

Khan has repeatedly appealed to IOA officials to release the funds, but his requests have been ignored. “The delay in the release of these funds is severely impacting my training schedule and preparation for the Winter Olympics,” he wrote to Usha.

The IOC has been monitoring the situation and has expressed concern over the internal conflict within the IOA. “We are aware that these funds have not been transferred to you by your NOC and we have been following up with them on a regular basis,” said Edward Kensington, Olympic Solidarity Continental Manager, Asia.

The IOC has initiated the process for the IOA to request a direct transfer of funds to Khan. However, the ongoing conflict within the IOA threatens to further delay the release of the scholarship.

IOA President PT Usha Yet to Receive Request for Emergency Meeting

IOA President PT Usha Yet to Receive Request for Emergency Meeting

The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) is facing internal turmoil as President PT Usha has yet to receive a letter requesting an emergency meeting to address pressing issues. Eleven of the 15 Executive Committee (EC) members had raised concerns about the “arbitrary” functioning of CEO Raghu Ram Iyer and Usha’s executive assistant, Ajay Narang.

Usha, however, claims she has not received the letter and alleges that the EC members prevented business from being transacted at the March 28 meeting by refusing to allow video recording. She emphasizes that her decisions prioritize athletes’ comfort.

Regarding hotel and ticket bookings, Usha states that despite the IOC’s mandate to complete bookings by August 2023, no action was taken until she intervened. She claims that the IOA failed to release advances for apartment complex bookings for extra team officials, resulting in the lapse of the booking.

Similarly, the IOA’s booking for golfers lapsed due to non-payment. In the case of shooting, the IOA assisted the National Rifle Association of India (NRAI) in securing funds from the sports ministry to pay the advance for the venue, which is located 300 kilometers from Paris.

Usha also highlights that two members of the three-member committee formed to oversee Olympic arrangements made themselves unavailable, preventing the appointment of replacements. She accuses the EC members of obstructing the smooth functioning of the IOA.

IOA Crisis: EC Calls for Emergency Meeting to Address Issues with President Usha

IOA Crisis: EC Calls for Emergency Meeting to Address Issues with President Usha

The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) is facing a crisis as the executive committee (EC) has called for an emergency meeting to address urgent issues with president PT Usha. The EC members have raised concerns over the arbitrary functioning of CEO Raghuram Iyer and Ajay Narang, Usha’s executive assistant.

The logjam has affected the functioning of the IOA, with financial bills being held up and preparations for the Paris Olympics in jeopardy. The EC members have pointed to the resignation of two senior members, Raj Laxmi Singh Deo and Sahdev Yadav, due to a lack of information and arbitrary actions by Iyer and Narang.

The EC has alleged that the duo is making unauthorized hotel and ticket bookings, granting unapproved accreditations, and spending IOA funds without following due processes. They have also expressed concerns over the appointment of Iyer as CEO, which they claim was illegal and unconstitutional.

The EC members have demanded that Usha consult them on key appointments, such as the chef-de-mission for the Paris Olympics, and make decisions as per the IOA constitution. They have also reiterated their opposition to Iyer’s appointment and Narang’s contract.

Usha has defended her actions, claiming that Iyer was appointed through proper procedures and that Narang is her executive assistant. However, the EC members maintain that they were not consulted on Iyer’s appointment and that Narang’s contract is a violation of the IOA constitution.

The crisis within the IOA has raised concerns about the preparations for the Paris Olympics. The EC members have urged Usha to address the issues urgently and ensure that the athletes are well-prepared for the Games.

Home
Shop
Wishlist0
Back to Top

Search For Products

Product has been added to your cart