IOA Sponsorship Deal with RIL Under Fire, Loss of ₹24 Crore Alleged

IOA Sponsorship Deal with RIL Under Fire, Loss of ₹24 Crore Alleged

The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) has been embroiled in a controversy over its sponsorship agreement with Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), which has been deemed “faulty” by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG). The CAG report alleges that the IOA has incurred a loss of ₹24 crore by granting RIL additional rights to four more Games (Winter Olympics 2026, 2030 and Youth Olympic Games 2026, 2030) at the same cost.

As per the initial agreement, RIL was made the principal partner till 2028 for ₹35 crore for the Asian Games (2022, 2026), Commonwealth Games (2024, 2028), and Olympics (2024 Paris and 2028 Los Angeles). However, the CAG report found that the IOA extended the tenure of the agreement to 2030 without any additional consideration.

IOA treasurer Sahdev Yadav has expressed concerns that the “potential value of such a deal would be considerably higher than what was proposed and agreed upon in the renegotiated agreement with RIL.” He also highlighted that India’s bid to host the 2030 Youth Olympic Games, whose sponsorship rights were given to RIL for free, could lead to a potential loss of over ₹100 crore.

President PT Usha has defended the deal, stating that the Executive Council members were part of the discussion during the renegotiation process. However, Yadav has refuted this claim, stating that even sponsorship committee chairman Rohit Rajpal had not given his consent.

The controversy has escalated, with the IOA accusing Yadav of being responsible for the IOC not releasing financial grants. Yadav has countered that the financial reports are meant to be signed by the president, CEO, and treasurer, and that he cannot sign on reports when the CEO’s appointment has not been ratified.

The IOC has expressed concerns over the ongoing governance issues within the IOA, particularly the obstruction to the ratification of the CEO’s appointment. The IOC has emphasized that this has hindered the IOA’s ability to function effectively.

CAG Audit Reveals Irregularities in IOA's Sponsorship Agreement with RIL

CAG Audit Reveals Irregularities in IOA’s Sponsorship Agreement with RIL

The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has released an audit report highlighting irregularities in the Indian Olympic Association’s (IOA) sponsorship agreement with Reliance India Limited (RIL). The report alleges that the agreement has resulted in undue favoritism towards RIL and a loss of ₹24 crore to the IOA.

Under the terms of the agreement, signed on August 1, 2022, RIL was granted the right to associate with the IOA as the Official Principal Partner for various sporting events, including the Asian Games, Commonwealth Games, and the Olympics. The agreement also gave RIL the exclusive rights to construct and showcase the ‘India House’ during these events.

However, the CAG report reveals that an amended agreement on December 5, 2023, granted RIL additional rights for the Winter Olympic Games and Youth Olympic Games without any corresponding increase in the consideration amount. The report states that the IOA should have raised the consideration amount from ₹35 crore to ₹59 crore, as the rights for six games were originally valued at ₹35 crore, or an average of ₹6 crore per game.

The report concludes that the “faulty agreement” with RIL has resulted in a loss of ₹24 crore to the IOA and undue favoritism towards the sponsor. The IOA president, PT Usha, has been asked to respond to the CAG’s findings.

IOA executive assistant Ajay Kumar Narang defended the agreement, claiming that it had to be renegotiated due to a flaw in the tender. He stated that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) had changed its conditions regarding sponsor naming rights, which necessitated additional compensation for RIL.

However, IOA treasurer Sahdev Yadav expressed concern that the executive council and sponsorship committee were not consulted during the amendment process. He questioned the authority of the president to make such changes and alleged that the agreement had led to a significant financial loss for the IOA.

The CAG’s report has raised serious questions about the transparency and accountability of the IOA’s sponsorship agreements. It remains to be seen how the IOA will respond to the allegations and whether any corrective measures will be taken to prevent similar irregularities in the future.

Home
Shop
Wishlist0
Back to Top

Search For Products

Product has been added to your cart