West Indies Fast Bowler Alzarri Joseph Suspended for Storming Off Field

West Indies Fast Bowler Alzarri Joseph Suspended for Storming Off Field

West Indies fast bowler Alzarri Joseph has been handed a two-match suspension for storming off the field during the series-clinching ODI win over England. The incident occurred during Wednesday’s game at Kensington Oval in Barbados, shortly after Joseph took the wicket of Jordan Cox in the fourth over.

Joseph’s departure left West Indies briefly down to 10 players before he returned for the sixth over. Cricket West Indies (CWI) has since released a statement condemning Joseph’s behavior, stating that it “fell short of CWI’s standards of professionalism.”

“Alzarri’s behavior did not align with the core values that Cricket West Indies upholds,” said CWI director of cricket Miles Bascombe. “Such conduct cannot be overlooked, and we have taken decisive action to ensure the gravity of the situation is fully acknowledged.”

Joseph has since apologized for his actions, saying that “my passion got the best of me.”

“I have personally apologized to captain Shai Hope and my teammates and management,” said Joseph. “I also extend my sincerest apologies to the West Indies fans. I understand that even a brief lapse in judgment can have a far-reaching impact, and I deeply regret any disappointment caused.”

The suspension means that Joseph will miss the remaining two ODIs of the series against England. It is a significant blow to the West Indies, who are looking to build on their series win.

Joseph’s suspension is a reminder of the importance of maintaining professionalism on the field. Players are expected to conduct themselves in a manner that reflects the values of the sport and their team. Joseph’s actions have not only let down his team but also the fans who support them.

Paul Pogba's Doping Ban Reduced to 18 Months by CAS

Paul Pogba’s Doping Ban Reduced to 18 Months by CAS

Paul Pogba’s Doping Ban Reduced to 18 Months

French midfielder Paul Pogba’s four-year ban for doping has been significantly reduced to 18 months by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). The decision was announced on Friday by a CAS spokesperson, who confirmed that the suspension will take effect from September 11, 2023.

Pogba, now 31 years old, tested positive for testosterone in August 2023, leading to his initial four-year ban. However, the CAS has now ruled that the ban should be reduced, citing mitigating circumstances. The reasons for the decision will be released at a later date.

The news of Pogba’s reduced ban comes as a relief to the player and his supporters. The former Manchester United and Juventus star has been out of action since his positive test, and the 18-month suspension will allow him to return to competitive football sooner than expected.

Pogba’s ban has been a major talking point in the football world, with many questioning the severity of the initial four-year punishment. The CAS’s decision to reduce the ban suggests that they believe there were extenuating circumstances that contributed to Pogba’s positive test.

It remains to be seen how Pogba will perform upon his return to football. The midfielder has been a key player for both club and country throughout his career, and his absence has been felt by both Manchester United and the French national team.

Pogba’s reduced ban is a reminder that even in the face of adversity, there is always hope for redemption. The midfielder will now have the opportunity to prove that he is still one of the best players in the world and that he can overcome this setback.

Argentina's Martinez Banned for Two Matches for Offensive Behavior

Argentina’s Martinez Banned for Two Matches for Offensive Behavior

Emiliano Martinez, Argentina’s World Cup-winning goalkeeper, has been suspended for two matches by FIFA for “offensive behavior” and “violating principles of fairplay.” The Argentine Football Association (AFA) announced the ban on Saturday.

Martinez, 32, was found to have violated FIFA’s code of conduct when he held a replica of the Copa America trophy to his groin after Argentina’s World Cup qualifier win over Chile on September 5. He had previously performed a similar action with the Golden Glove trophy for best goalkeeper after Argentina’s victory over France in the 2022 World Cup final.

FIFA also sanctioned Martinez for hitting a TV cameraman’s camera with his gloves after Argentina’s 2-1 defeat by Colombia on September 10.

The AFA expressed its dissatisfaction with the FIFA ruling, stating in a statement that it “expresses its absolute disagreement with the decision taken by the FIFA disciplinary committee.”

As a result of the suspension, Martinez will miss Argentina’s World Cup qualifiers against Venezuela on October 10 and Bolivia on October 15. Argentina currently leads the South American qualifying table with 18 points after eight matches, with Colombia trailing by just two points.

Martinez’s suspension highlights the ongoing debate over the appropriate boundaries of celebration in sports. While some argue that his actions were harmless and in the spirit of the game, others believe that they were disrespectful and unsportsmanlike.

The incident also raises questions about the role of FIFA in regulating player behavior. Some critics argue that the organization is too quick to punish players for minor offenses, while others believe that it is necessary to maintain a level of decorum in the sport.

Anwar Ali Cleared to Play for East Bengal After AIFF Reverses Suspension

Anwar Ali Cleared to Play for East Bengal After AIFF Reverses Suspension

Anwar Ali Cleared to Play for East Bengal After AIFF Reverses Suspension

Indian defender Anwar Ali has been granted a No Objection Certificate (NOC) by the All India Football Federation’s (AIFF) Players Status Committee, allowing him to officially join East Bengal. This decision comes after the Delhi High Court ordered a rehearing of Ali’s case, overturning a previous four-month suspension imposed by the AIFF.

The AIFF had initially suspended Ali for allegedly terminating his contract with Mohun Bagan in an unjust manner. The federation also sought a hefty compensation of Rs 12.90 crore from Ali, Delhi FC, and East Bengal. However, the Delhi High Court intervened, criticizing the AIFF’s decision for lacking reasoning and failing to follow principles of natural justice.

The court directed the AIFF to reconsider its ruling, and the Players Status Committee has now granted Ali the NOC. This means that Ali is now free to join East Bengal and participate in the ongoing Indian Super League. He will be available for their upcoming match against Kerala Blasters on September 22 and the highly-anticipated Kolkata Derby against Mohun Bagan on October 19.

Ali’s suspension had been a major setback for both the player and East Bengal. The defender is a key member of the Indian national team and has been a consistent performer for East Bengal in the past. His return to the team will provide a significant boost to their title aspirations.

The AIFF’s decision to reverse Ali’s suspension is a positive step towards ensuring fairness and transparency in Indian football. It also highlights the importance of due process and the right to a fair hearing for players.

India Defender Anwar Ali Challenges AIFF Suspension

India Defender Anwar Ali Challenges AIFF Suspension

India Defender Anwar Ali, East Bengal, and Delhi FC Challenge AIFF Suspension

India defender Anwar Ali, along with his current club East Bengal and parent club Delhi FC, have filed a writ petition with the Delhi High Court challenging the four-month suspension imposed on the player by the All India Football Federation (AIFF). The suspension stems from Anwar’s alleged “illegal termination” of his four-year contract with Mohun Bagan.

The AIFF’s Players Status Committee found Anwar guilty of breaching his contract and ordered him, East Bengal, and Delhi FC to pay a hefty compensation of Rs 12.90 crore to Mohun Bagan. The compensation includes Rs 8.40 crore for the residual value of the contract, Rs 2 crore paid to Delhi FC under a loan agreement, and Rs 2.50 crore for other damages.

Delhi FC owner Ranjit Bajaj expressed concern over the suspension, stating that it would deprive Anwar of valuable playing time. “How can we let the player lose out on matches in the coming days? You can get money back, but you can’t get the matches back once they are played,” he said.

East Bengal’s top official, Debabrata Sarkar, echoed Bajaj’s sentiments, emphasizing the importance of Anwar’s participation in the upcoming Indian Super League (ISL). “We have approached the Delhi HC to ensure that Anwar can play until the AIFF’s Appeals Committee makes a decision on the matter,” Sarkar said. “The player’s career should not be affected at all cost.”

The AIFF’s Players Status Committee also banned East Bengal and Delhi FC from registering players for two transfer windows for their involvement in Anwar’s contract breach. The committee ruled that all three parties are jointly liable for the compensation amount.

Anwar’s transfer to East Bengal sparked controversy in Kolkata, with Mohun Bagan challenging the move and filing a complaint with the AIFF. The 23-year-old defender played a crucial role in Mohun Bagan’s ISL Shield-winning campaign last season, scoring three goals and providing one assist in 26 games.

The Delhi High Court is expected to hear the writ petition on Friday. The outcome of the case will have significant implications for Anwar’s career and the future of player contracts in Indian football.

Rishabh Pant Suspended for One Match for Slow Over-Rate

Rishabh Pant Suspended for One Match for Slow Over-Rate

Delhi Capitals captain Rishabh Pant has been suspended for one match and fined Rs 30 lakh for breaching the IPL Code of Conduct. The incident occurred during Match 56 of the TATA Indian Premier League (IPL) 2024 against Rajasthan Royals, where Delhi Capitals maintained a slow over-rate.

This is the third offense of the season for Delhi Capitals under the IPL’s Code of Conduct relating to minimum over-rate offenses. As a result, Pant has been suspended for one match and fined a hefty sum. The rest of the Playing XI, including the Impact Player, were each individually fined either INR 12 Lac or 50 per cent of their respective match fees, whichever is lesser.

Earlier in the season, Pant was fined Rs 24 lakh for a second over-rate offense in Match 16 against the Kolkata Knight Riders. Before that, Delhi Capitals maintained a slow over rate in a match against Chennai Super Kings, resulting in a Rs 12 lakh fine for Pant.

The Delhi Capitals filed an appeal challenging the ruling of the Match Referee, but the appeal was referred to the BCCI Ombudsman for review. The Ombudsman conducted a virtual hearing and affirmed that the decision of the Match Referee remains final and binding.

Pant’s suspension is a significant blow to Delhi Capitals, who are currently fifth in the IPL table with 12 points from as many games. They will face Royal Challengers Bengaluru in their next match on Sunday without their captain.

Bajrang Punia Indefinitely Suspended by NADA, Olympic Hopes in Jeopardy

Bajrang Punia Indefinitely Suspended by NADA, Olympic Hopes in Jeopardy

The National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) has indefinitely suspended wrestler Bajrang Punia, potentially jeopardizing his participation in the upcoming Paris Olympics. Punia failed to provide a urine sample during selection trials on March 10, prompting NADA to issue the suspension.

According to NADA’s official release, Punia has been provisionally suspended from all competitions and activities pending a hearing on the matter. The suspension stems from Punia’s refusal to provide a sample despite being informed of the consequences.

Punia, a bronze medalist at the Tokyo Olympics, was among several wrestlers who accused former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) president Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh of sexual harassment. The suspension comes as a setback for Punia, who was expected to compete in the selection trials later this month.

In the absence of Punia, Sujeet Kalkal will represent India at the World Qualifiers in Istanbul on May 9. The suspension notice was addressed to the WFI’s now-defunct ad hoc committee, rather than the federation recognized by United World Wrestling (UWW).

Punia had previously claimed that he had expired dope-collecting kits, but disregarded the dope control officer’s directive. The DCO’s report states that Punia left the venue despite being informed that his refusal would result in a warning for breaking anti-doping rules.

Punia has been asked to provide a written justification for his refusal by May 7. If he accepts the consequences, the case will be resolved without further disciplinary proceedings. However, if he disagrees, the matter will be referred to the anti-doping disciplinary panel.

KKR's Harshit Rana Fined and Suspended for Code of Conduct Breach

KKR’s Harshit Rana Fined and Suspended for Code of Conduct Breach

Harshit Rana, the Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) fast bowler, has been handed a hefty fine and a one-match suspension for breaching the Indian Premier League (IPL) Code of Conduct during his team’s match against Delhi Capitals (DC).

Rana’s offense occurred during the seventh over of DC’s innings when he dismissed batter Abishek Porel. As Porel walked back to the pavilion, Rana engaged in animated celebrations, which were deemed inappropriate by the match officials.

The IPL release did not specify the exact nature of Rana’s breach, but it is believed to be related to his excessive celebration towards Porel. Rana was subsequently charged with a Level 1 breach under Article 2.5 of the tournament rules, which prohibits “conduct that is contrary to the spirit of the game.”

This is Rana’s second offense of the season, having previously been penalized for a similar incident during KKR’s match against Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH). In that game, Rana gave SRH batter Mayank Agarwal a sharp stare after dismissing him, resulting in a 60% match fee fine.

As a result of his latest breach, Rana has been fined 100% of his match fee and suspended for one game. He will miss KKR’s upcoming match against Mumbai Indians at the Wankhede Stadium on May 3.

The suspension is a significant blow to KKR, who are currently second in the IPL standings with 12 points. Rana has been a key contributor to the team’s success this season, taking 11 wickets in eight matches.

The incident highlights the importance of maintaining sportsmanship and respecting opponents in the IPL. The tournament’s Code of Conduct is designed to ensure fair play and prevent unsportsmanlike behavior.

Delhi HC Considers Ad Hoc Committee for Suspended Wrestling Federation of India

Delhi HC Considers Ad Hoc Committee for Suspended Wrestling Federation of India

The Delhi High Court is considering the formation of an ad hoc committee to manage the suspended Wrestling Federation of India (WFI). Justice Sachin Datta has granted the Union Sports Ministry another opportunity to clarify its stance on managing the federation’s affairs after the dissolution of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) ad hoc committee.

The court criticized the ministry for failing to file an affidavit explaining its decision to suspend the WFI and the circumstances surrounding the dissolution of the IOA’s ad hoc committee. Justice Datta indicated that he may appoint an ad hoc committee if the ministry does not provide a clear explanation.

The court’s consideration stems from an application filed by four wrestlers, including Tokyo Olympics bronze medalist Bajrang Punia, who sought directions to the ministry not to revoke the WFI’s suspension. The wrestlers also requested the appointment of a one-man committee to oversee the management of the WFI.

The IOA had dissolved its ad hoc committee on March 18, citing the lifting of the WFI’s ban by the United World Wrestling (UWW) and the successful completion of selection trials. However, the wrestlers argued that the ministry’s suspension order remained in effect.

The ministry’s counsel requested a week’s time to file an affidavit, claiming that the response needed approval from the Joint Secretary, who was out of the country. The wrestlers’ counsel alleged that the ministry’s stance was dependent on whether the “ousted gentleman” (former WFI president Sanjay Singh) received a ticket for the upcoming elections.

The WFI, represented by senior advocate Dayanan Krishnan, informed the court that a coordinate bench had issued notice in the federation’s plea challenging the ministry’s order suspending the elected executive committee.

The IOA, in its affidavit, stated that it withdrew the ad hoc committee to avoid conflict with the Olympic Charter and UWW rules. It emphasized that the WFI’s recognition by the UWW is paramount and that the NOC cannot interfere in the affairs of NSFs.

The court has adjourned the matter for further hearing, awaiting the ministry’s affidavit and the wrestlers’ response.

WFI to Operate Independently if Suspension Not Lifted

WFI to Operate Independently if Suspension Not Lifted

The Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) has resolved to operate independently of government funding if its suspension is not lifted. This decision was made at a Special General Meeting (SGM) held in Noida after the United World Wrestling (UWW) lifted its suspension and the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) dissolved the ad-hoc panel managing the WFI.

The WFI’s suspension by the government stemmed from alleged rule violations during its election process. However, the UWW’s decision to lift its suspension and the IOA’s dissolution of the ad-hoc panel have paved the way for the elected office bearers to resume control.

Despite these developments, the government has yet to lift its suspension. The WFI has unanimously agreed to operate without government funding if the suspension remains in place. This would mean that the WFI would be responsible for funding wrestlers’ training, competitions, and foreign exposure trips.

The WFI has also amended its Constitution to eliminate the requirement for a two-third majority for candidates contesting elections for new posts. This amendment simplifies the election process and allows for greater flexibility in leadership selection.

Additionally, the WFI has removed the requirement for state associations to have recognition from State Olympic Committees (SOCs) for affiliation with the national body. This move aims to prevent misuse of the clause by suspended state bodies claiming legitimacy through SOC recognition.

All state bodies have been instructed to adhere to the National Sports Code in conducting elections and functioning. Age and tenure guidelines must be followed by all affiliated entities.

Home
Shop
Wishlist0
Back to Top

Search For Products

Product has been added to your cart