WFI Withdraws Selection Trial Circular After Court Reprimand

WFI Withdraws Selection Trial Circular After Court Reprimand

The Wrestling Federation of India (WFI), led by Sanjay Singh, has withdrawn its controversial circular for conducting selection trials for the Indian Senior Wrestling Team for the 2024 Senior World Wrestling Championship. The decision came after the Delhi High Court reprimanded the WFI for issuing the circular despite the court’s order restoring the mandate of the ad hoc committee appointed by the International Olympic Association (IOA).

On August 16, the High Court had restored the mandate of the ad hoc committee, stating that its dissolution was “unwarranted” and “incongruous.” The court also noted that the union sports ministry had not expressed any reservations or protests against the dissolution.

The WFI’s decision to withdraw the circular was made in response to a contempt plea filed by wrestler Satyawart Kadian. Kadian had contended that the Centre, WFI, and the WFI ad hoc committee had failed to comply with the court’s August 16 order.

The court had earlier directed the ad hoc committee to conduct the selection trials for the Indian Senior Wrestling Team. The WFI’s attempt to hold its own trials was seen as a violation of the court’s order.

The WFI’s withdrawal of the circular ensures that the ad hoc committee will continue to hold the selection trials. This decision is expected to bring clarity and fairness to the selection process for the Indian Senior Wrestling Team.

WFI President Optimistic About Women's Wrestling Medals in 2028 Olympics

WFI President Optimistic About Women’s Wrestling Medals in 2028 Olympics

The Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) President, Sanjay Singh, has expressed optimism about India’s potential to win multiple medals in women’s wrestling at the 2028 Olympic Games. However, he emphasized the need for certain institutions to cease interfering in the federation’s operations.

Despite the International Wrestling Federation (UWW) lifting its suspension of WFI in February, the Indian Sports Ministry continues to keep the federation suspended. The suspension was imposed in December 2022 following the announcement of U-15 and U-20 Nationals hours after the election of Sanjay Singh as President.

Singh believes that if WFI is allowed to function independently, India can achieve significant success in women’s wrestling. He pointed to the recent triumph of India’s U17 women’s team at the World Championships, where five wrestlers emerged as world champions.

Singh also urged Vinesh Phogat to reconsider her retirement decision. Phogat announced her retirement after failing to medal at the Paris Olympics due to a weight disqualification. Singh believes that Phogat’s experience and inspiration would be invaluable to the next generation of wrestlers.

Reflecting on the wrestlers’ movement in 2023, Singh acknowledged that it has taught WFI a valuable lesson. He believes that the movement, which was sparked by allegations of sexual harassment against the then WFI president, was politically motivated and hindered India’s Olympic performance.

Singh emphasized the importance of separating wrestling from politics and announced plans to establish a wrestling academy in Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh. He is optimistic that the academy will foster the development of young wrestlers and contribute to India’s future success in the sport.

Delhi HC Restores IOA Ad Hoc Committee for Wrestling Federation of India

Delhi HC Restores IOA Ad Hoc Committee for Wrestling Federation of India

The Delhi High Court has reinstated the Indian Olympic Association’s (IOA) ad hoc committee to oversee the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI). The decision came in response to a plea filed by renowned wrestlers Bajrang Punia, Vinesh Phogat, Sakshi Malik, and her husband Satyawart Kadian.

The court’s interim order overturned the IOA’s dissolution of the ad hoc committee, which was formed after the WFI’s elections in December 2023. The court held that the IOA’s decision was incompatible with the Union Sports Ministry’s suspension of the WFI following the elections.

Justice Sachin Datta rejected the petitioners’ request to appoint a retired high court or Supreme Court judge as the WFI administrator. Instead, the court allowed the IOA to reconstitute the ad hoc committee with eminent sportspersons or experts who have experience in dealing with international federations.

The wrestlers had protested at Jantar Mantar last year, demanding the arrest of outgoing WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh for alleged sexual harassment. They subsequently filed a petition in the high court to annul the WFI elections.

The Sports Ministry suspended the WFI on December 24, 2023, for allegedly violating its constitution. The IOA then formed an ad hoc committee to manage the WFI’s affairs. However, the United World Wrestling (UWW) lifted the suspension in February, prompting the IOA to dissolve its ad hoc committee on March 18.

The court ruled that the UWW’s lifting of the ban was unrelated to the Sports Ministry’s suspension order and the formation of the ad hoc committee. It also stated that the Sports Ministry should not have adopted a passive approach that undermined its own orders.

The court emphasized that the ad hoc committee will continue to manage the WFI’s affairs until the Sports Ministry’s suspension order is reviewed or recalled. It also noted that the Paris Olympic Games are over, and there is no reason for the ministry to delay a decision on the suspension order.

Indian Wrestling Performance at Paris Olympics Disappoints

Indian Wrestling Performance at Paris Olympics Disappoints

India’s wrestling performance at the Paris Olympic Games has been underwhelming, with only one bronze medal to show for their efforts. Aman Sehrawat’s bronze in his maiden Olympic appearance is the lone bright spot, but the overall performance has been deemed ordinary by many.

The Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief, Sanjay Singh, attributes the lackluster showing to the protests that Indian wrestlers staged for over a year. The protests, sparked by allegations against former wrestling body chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, disrupted the wrestlers’ training and preparation.

“The protests that took place for 14-15 months disturbed the entire wrestling fraternity,” Singh told India Today. “The wrestlers in other categories struggled as they could not practice without national and international tournaments.”

Apart from Sehrawat and Vinesh Phogat, who impressed in Paris, other wrestlers like Anshu Malik, Reetika Hooda, Nisha Dahiya, and Antim Panghal failed to make an impact.

Phogat, who was disqualified from the final for exceeding the weight limit, is still awaiting a verdict from the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) on her plea for a silver medal. CAS has established an ad hoc division in Paris to handle Olympic cases, and a decision is expected by August 16.

Phogat’s disqualification was a major disappointment for India, as she was a strong contender for gold. She had reached the final by defeating Cuba’s Yusneylis Guzman Lopez 5-0 in the semi-finals.

The 29-year-old Phogat announced her retirement from wrestling after her disqualification. Her departure is a significant loss for Indian wrestling, as she has been one of the country’s most successful wrestlers in recent years.

UWW Warns of Suspension for WFI and Indian Wrestlers Amid Government Interference

UWW Warns of Suspension for WFI and Indian Wrestlers Amid Government Interference

The Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) faces the threat of another suspension from the United World Wrestling (UWW) due to ongoing government interference. Ten days after the sports ministry informed the Delhi High Court that it would not recognize or support WFI, UWW has issued a stern warning.

In a letter signed by UWW president Nenad Lalovic, the global governing body expressed its determination to uphold WFI’s independence and autonomy. UWW stated that if the government imposes an ad hoc committee to oversee WFI’s affairs, it would have no choice but to re-impose a temporary suspension on the federation. This suspension could extend to Indian wrestlers, potentially affecting their participation in the final Olympic Games Qualifying Tournament in May.

The UWW ban would also draw the attention of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), which may consider further action. This comes after WFI appointed an Athletes Commission in accordance with UWW’s demand, with former Commonwealth Games gold medalist Narsingh Yadav elected as chairman.

UWW had previously suspended WFI in August 2023 due to delays in holding elections. The ban was lifted in February, and the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) reinstated WFI. However, the sports ministry has maintained its suspension since December 2023.

In an affidavit filed with the Delhi High Court, the ministry stated that it would review the suspension only after visible improvement in WFI’s governance. The ministry also declared that any national championships or competitions organized by WFI would be considered unsanctioned and unrecognised.

WFI officials have expressed concern over the government’s interference, emphasizing the need for autonomy. They have pointed out that UWW’s potential ban on wrestlers would be unprecedented in Indian history.

Meanwhile, Indian wrestlers’ performance has been a cause for concern. At the recent Asian Olympic Qualifiers, only three female wrestlers secured quotas, while the male wrestlers failed to qualify.

Vinesh Phogat Accuses WFI of Obstructing Olympic Qualification Bid

Vinesh Phogat Accuses WFI of Obstructing Olympic Qualification Bid

Wrestler Vinesh Phogat has accused the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) of attempting to hinder her participation in the Olympic Qualifiers by creating logistical obstacles for her support staff. Phogat, a 29-year-old bronze medalist in the 53kg category at the 2019 and 2022 World Championships, also expressed concerns about being implicated in a doping case.

The WFI, however, has denied these allegations, stating that Phogat’s request for accreditation of her coach and physio came after the deadline for entry submissions had expired. The federation claims to have sent the entries of players, coaches, and medical staff to the world governing body UWW on March 15, after UWW extended the deadline slightly.

Phogat, who is aiming for an Olympic quota in the 50kg category at the Asian qualifying tournament in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, has alleged that WFI President Brij Bhushan and his associates are trying to prevent her from competing. She expressed fears that her water could be tampered with during her match, leading to a potential doping violation.

The WFI has clarified that it has no objection to Phogat traveling with her personal coach and physio but that she must obtain accreditation from UWW herself. The federation maintains that it has already registered the support staff and did not receive any instructions from the Ministry or SAI to add Phogat’s coach to the list.

Phogat’s allegations come amidst ongoing tensions between her and the WFI. She was one of the three wrestlers who led a protest against former WFI President Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, accusing him of sexual harassment. Singh was granted bail in July after a case was filed against him by Delhi Police.

Phogat has questioned whether the difficulties she is facing are a result of her involvement in the protest. She has expressed hope that justice will be served before she represents India at the Olympic Qualifiers.

Delhi HC Considers Ad Hoc Committee for Suspended Wrestling Federation of India

Delhi HC Considers Ad Hoc Committee for Suspended Wrestling Federation of India

The Delhi High Court is considering the formation of an ad hoc committee to manage the suspended Wrestling Federation of India (WFI). Justice Sachin Datta has granted the Union Sports Ministry another opportunity to clarify its stance on managing the federation’s affairs after the dissolution of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) ad hoc committee.

The court criticized the ministry for failing to file an affidavit explaining its decision to suspend the WFI and the circumstances surrounding the dissolution of the IOA’s ad hoc committee. Justice Datta indicated that he may appoint an ad hoc committee if the ministry does not provide a clear explanation.

The court’s consideration stems from an application filed by four wrestlers, including Tokyo Olympics bronze medalist Bajrang Punia, who sought directions to the ministry not to revoke the WFI’s suspension. The wrestlers also requested the appointment of a one-man committee to oversee the management of the WFI.

The IOA had dissolved its ad hoc committee on March 18, citing the lifting of the WFI’s ban by the United World Wrestling (UWW) and the successful completion of selection trials. However, the wrestlers argued that the ministry’s suspension order remained in effect.

The ministry’s counsel requested a week’s time to file an affidavit, claiming that the response needed approval from the Joint Secretary, who was out of the country. The wrestlers’ counsel alleged that the ministry’s stance was dependent on whether the “ousted gentleman” (former WFI president Sanjay Singh) received a ticket for the upcoming elections.

The WFI, represented by senior advocate Dayanan Krishnan, informed the court that a coordinate bench had issued notice in the federation’s plea challenging the ministry’s order suspending the elected executive committee.

The IOA, in its affidavit, stated that it withdrew the ad hoc committee to avoid conflict with the Olympic Charter and UWW rules. It emphasized that the WFI’s recognition by the UWW is paramount and that the NOC cannot interfere in the affairs of NSFs.

The court has adjourned the matter for further hearing, awaiting the ministry’s affidavit and the wrestlers’ response.

WFI Clarifies Selection Policy for Paris Olympics, Doors Open for All Wrestlers

WFI Clarifies Selection Policy for Paris Olympics, Doors Open for All Wrestlers

The Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) has clarified its stance on the selection of wrestlers for the Paris Olympics, stating that the doors remain open for all athletes, including Olympic medalists Bajrang Punia and Ravi Dahiya.

WFI President Sanjay Singh emphasized that the federation will adhere to its selection policy, which stipulates that the performance of quota-winning wrestlers will be reviewed before a decision is made on holding a selection trial prior to the Paris Games.

“There is no confusion now. The ad-hoc committee is no longer in place, and WFI will follow the rules and regulations of its selection policy,” Singh said. “It states that whoever wins the Olympic berth, their performance will be assessed. If the performance is satisfactory, the same wrestler will go to Paris. Otherwise, the wrestler who is performing well in the same weight class will get an opportunity.”

Regarding Dahiya and Punia, Singh stated that their performances will be evaluated, as will those of all other wrestlers. “There will be no discrimination against anyone,” he added.

The teams for the two Olympic qualification tournaments were selected based on the ad-hoc panel’s selection policy, which allowed the top four wrestlers from these trials to qualify for a final trial in May for the Paris Olympics.

In the 53kg weight class, Antim Panghal has already qualified, while double world medalist Vinesh Phogat is among the contenders to challenge her for Paris. However, Phogat will also have the opportunity to secure a berth for India in the 50kg category.

“Vinesh will be competing in the 50kg Olympic qualification tournament in Bishkek,” Singh confirmed.

At the WFI Special General Meeting in Noida, amendments to the constitution were approved, including age, tenure, and cooling-off period guidelines as per the Sports Code. The 70-year age cap and two consecutive terms (or eight years), followed by a mandatory four-year cooling-off period, will now apply to all WFI executive council positions.

The SGM also adopted a resolution to conduct Athletes Commission elections as mandated by United World Wrestling (UWW). The elections will be held during the Federation Cup in Varanasi from April 24-26.

WFI, which was suspended by the Sports Ministry, discussed the possibility of functioning without government funding. “UWW and IOA have lifted the suspension on WFI. We hope the Sports Ministry also lifts the suspension, but at present, we are not receiving any financial help from the government, so we discussed ways to run the organization,” Singh said.

WFI Secretary General Prem Chand Lohcab, who came from the camp of protesting wrestlers, has not attended any of the three WFI meetings. WFI adopted a resolution that if the secretary general fails to forward proposed amendments to every member of the general council as described in the WFI constitution, the president may authorize one of the joint secretaries to do so.

WFI to Operate Independently if Suspension Not Lifted

WFI to Operate Independently if Suspension Not Lifted

The Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) has resolved to operate independently of government funding if its suspension is not lifted. This decision was made at a Special General Meeting (SGM) held in Noida after the United World Wrestling (UWW) lifted its suspension and the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) dissolved the ad-hoc panel managing the WFI.

The WFI’s suspension by the government stemmed from alleged rule violations during its election process. However, the UWW’s decision to lift its suspension and the IOA’s dissolution of the ad-hoc panel have paved the way for the elected office bearers to resume control.

Despite these developments, the government has yet to lift its suspension. The WFI has unanimously agreed to operate without government funding if the suspension remains in place. This would mean that the WFI would be responsible for funding wrestlers’ training, competitions, and foreign exposure trips.

The WFI has also amended its Constitution to eliminate the requirement for a two-third majority for candidates contesting elections for new posts. This amendment simplifies the election process and allows for greater flexibility in leadership selection.

Additionally, the WFI has removed the requirement for state associations to have recognition from State Olympic Committees (SOCs) for affiliation with the national body. This move aims to prevent misuse of the clause by suspended state bodies claiming legitimacy through SOC recognition.

All state bodies have been instructed to adhere to the National Sports Code in conducting elections and functioning. Age and tenure guidelines must be followed by all affiliated entities.

Vinesh Phogat Secures Olympic Qualification, Demands Assurance for 53kg Trial

Vinesh Phogat Secures Olympic Qualification, Demands Assurance for 53kg Trial

Vinesh Phogat, India’s star wrestler, has secured her place in the Paris Olympics Qualification tournament in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, after winning the 50kg weight category at the selection trials. However, her participation in the trials was marked by controversy as she demanded a written assurance from the authorities that a final trial will be held in the 53kg weight class before the Olympics.

Phogat, who won the gold medal in the 50kg category at the 2018 Jakarta Asian Games, initially refused to compete in the 50kg trials, citing her desire to participate in both the 50kg and 53kg categories. This led to a delay in the start of the trials, as officials discussed her request.

Eventually, the ad-hoc committee for wrestling agreed to Phogat’s demand, allowing her to compete in both weight categories on Monday. Phogat defeated Shivani 11-6 in the 50kg category, but lost to Anju by technical superiority 0-10 in the 53kg bout.

Phogat’s demand for a written assurance stems from her previous allegations of sexual harassment against former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) President Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh. She fears that if the WFI regains control, the federation may change the selection policy and prevent her from competing in the 53kg category at the Olympics.

The IOA ad-hoc panel has already announced that a final trial will be held to pick India’s representative in the 53kg category. The best four wrestlers in the weight class will compete in trials near the Games, and the winner will face Antim Panghal, who has already earned an Olympic quota in that category. The winner of that bout will represent India at the Olympics.

Phogat’s participation in the trials and her demand for a written assurance highlight the ongoing power struggle within the WFI. The federation has been embroiled in controversy since Phogat’s allegations against Singh, and the ad-hoc committee was appointed to oversee the sport until the matter is resolved.

Home
Shop
Wishlist0
Back to Top

Search For Products

Product has been added to your cart