Ian Chappell Slams Indian and English Batters for Poor Footwork, Criticizes Reverse Sweep
Former Australian captain Ian Chappell has launched a scathing attack on the footwork of Indian and English batters in Test cricket, particularly Virat Kohli. Chappell’s criticism comes in the wake of India’s batting struggles in recent weeks, including their failure to chase down a modest target of 146 against New Zealand. England’s batting also collapsed in spin-friendly conditions in Pakistan during the final two Tests.
Chappell singled out Kohli’s dismissal in the first innings of the third Test against New Zealand as an example of India’s lack of decisive footwork. He argued that Kohli could have easily avoided being clean bowled by Santner if he had taken a small step out of his crease. However, Chappell also acknowledged that Kohli’s shot selection was questionable.
Chappell also expressed his disapproval of the reverse sweep shot in Test cricket. He questioned the logic of practicing the shot ahead of the third Test in Mumbai, given its inherent risks. He pointed to the dismissal of Yashasvi Jaiswal in the Mumbai Test as a prime example of the dangers of the reverse sweep.
Chappell went so far as to label the reverse sweep as an “illegal” shot, arguing that it violates the principles of fairness in the game. He believes that the shot should be banned because it gives batters an unfair advantage by allowing them to change the order of their hands or feet.
The reverse sweep proved to be a costly shot for India on Day 3 of the third Test, with Ravichandran Ashwin becoming the eighth wicket to fall while attempting it. Chappell’s criticism highlights the ongoing debate about the role of footwork and shot selection in Test cricket, and his views are likely to spark further discussion among players, coaches, and fans.
