The Indian Premier League (IPL) is set to return for its 16th season, but the fate of the controversial ‘Impact Player’ rule remains uncertain. Despite calls for its removal, several players and experts have expressed their support for its retention.
Ravichandran Ashwin, India’s premier spinner, believes the rule adds strategic value to the game. “It gives a little more value for strategy,” he said. “The other side of that argument is it doesn’t encourage all-rounders. But no one is stopping them.”
Former India pacer Zaheer Khan, now the mentor of the Lucknow Super Giants, echoed Ashwin’s sentiments. “I’m all for it,” he said. “It has definitely given opportunities to a lot of uncapped Indian talents.”
Khan emphasized the rule’s positive impact on young players. “That opportunity goes a long way with improving Indian cricket on the whole,” he said. “The time spent in match time, it’s something you cannot beat.”
However, not all players are convinced. Virat Kohli, the former India captain, has criticized the rule for disrupting the game’s balance. Rohit Sharma, the current India skipper, has also expressed his reservations.
The ‘Impact Player’ rule allows teams to substitute a player during the match, providing tactical flexibility. However, critics argue that it undermines the role of all-rounders and disrupts the flow of the game.
As the IPL auction approaches, teams will be weighing the pros and cons of the rule. While some may see it as an opportunity to bolster their squads with versatile players, others may prefer to stick with traditional team compositions.
The ultimate decision on the rule’s future lies with the IPL Governing Council. With the tournament set to begin in March, the fate of the ‘Impact Player’ rule will be closely watched by fans and players alike.
