Bangladesh all-rounder Shakib Al Hasan’s request for security to play his final Test match at home has sparked a debate about his political stance. Shakib, who announced his retirement ahead of the second Test against India, expressed his desire to play his last game against South Africa in Dhaka. However, his involvement in a murder case and subsequent FIR has raised concerns about his safety.
Bangladesh Youth and Sports Adviser Asif Mahmud responded to Shakib’s request, stating that he would receive security like any other cricketer. However, he emphasized that Shakib’s former political affiliation cannot be ignored. Shakib contested the general elections as a candidate for the Awami League, which has drawn mixed reactions from the public.
Mahmud clarified that the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) is obligated to provide security to all citizens, including Shakib. However, he raised concerns about potential public outrage towards Shakib due to his political identity. He suggested that Shakib should clarify his political stance to mitigate any security risks.
“If the general people have outrage towards him because of his political identity… can they, five or six people, protect me?” Mahmud questioned. “Hence, if the people are angry with me, then I have to reduce that with my words. I think he has to make his position clear and talk about his political standpoint.”
Mahmud cited the example of former Bangladesh captain Mashrafe Bin Mortaza, who had previously addressed his political views. He emphasized that if there are security risks from the public, no one can guarantee protection, even for high-profile individuals like Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina.
Shakib’s political involvement has been a topic of discussion in Bangladesh. Some have criticized his decision to enter politics while others have defended his right to do so. The debate over his security request highlights the complex relationship between sports and politics in the country.
