Former Australian captain Ian Chappell has launched a scathing critique of England skipper Ben Stokes’ captaincy, attributing India’s series-sealing victory in the fourth Test to a critical lapse in strategy at a pivotal juncture.
Chappell’s criticism stems from Stokes’ decision to utilize part-time spinner Joe Root instead of deploying the experienced Jimmy Anderson on the third evening of the Test. According to Chappell, this allowed India to gain momentum, ultimately shifting the balance of the match in their favor.
“On the third evening, Stokes desperately needed to start India’s chase with his best two bowlers and try to claim at least one wicket,” Chappell said. “Incredibly, he gave the ball to a part-timer, Joe Root, and ignored the experienced, probing bowling of Jimmy Anderson.”
Chappell also criticized Stokes’ approach on the final day, suggesting that his cautious field placings allowed India’s batsmen to accumulate easy singles, thereby making the chase more manageable for the hosts.
“The second innings should have been a time to force the Indian batters into taking a risk, but by allowing easy singles, Stokes gave his opponents the upper hand,” Chappell remarked.
Chappell emphasized the need for instinctive decision-making in captaincy, suggesting that Stokes could benefit from studying the leadership style of seasoned captains like Pakistan’s Javed Miandad in demanding situations.
“Effective captaincy often relies on gut instincts rather than rigid adherence to statistical analysis or theoretical frameworks,” Chappell said. “Stokes needs to develop that intuitive sense of leadership.”
Chappell’s critique highlights the importance of bold and decisive captaincy, particularly in high-pressure situations. Stokes’ failure to make the right calls at crucial moments ultimately cost England the series.
